Pope Benedict must be asked to affirm the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). He now uses a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I). Then he claims there is ' a development of doctrine'.

 Pope Benedict must be asked to affirm the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). He now uses a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I). Then he claims there is ' a development of doctrine'. Without the false premise BOD, BOB and I.I do not contradict EENS as it wasw interpreted by the missionaries in the 16th century.

This issue is 'dcotrinal' according to his statement on the canonical recognition of the Society of St. Pius X.

He can also avoid, what he called the 'hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition'. - Lionel Andrades

ANUARY 10, 2021

Pope Benedict must be asked to affirm the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24 Q, 27 Q) and Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church interpreted rationally,without the false premise.Since Vatican Council II he has denied the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors and other Magisterial documents which affirm exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/01/pope-benedict-must-be-asked-to-affirm.html