The Decree of Precepts and Prohibitions placed upon the St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire for affirming the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), with no known exceptions, could also be placed upon the other religious communities in the Diocese of Manchester, men and women, if they did not unethically use a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and create fake exceptions for EENS.
The Decree could also be applied to Fr.Georges de Laire, Judicial Vicar, of the diocese, who unethically interprets all Magisterial documents, including Vatican Council II, with a false premise and inference to create a rupture with the teaching on their being exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church ( EENS, Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX etc).
Similarly the Secretaries of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Archbishops Giacomo Morandi and Augustine di Noia would also be affirming EENS according to the missionaries of the 16th century if they did not deceptively use the fake premise confusing what is invisible as being visible and then creating a New Theology based upon this error.The same could also be said for Bishop Peter Libasci, bishop of Manchester, his Chancellor and other members of the Curia.
So the sanctions against the St. Benedict Cener are unjust. They should be removed. -Lionel Andrades
_________________________________________
FEBRUARY 9, 2021
Seven questions which Bishop Peter Libasci , Diane Quinlin, the Chancellor and the Rev. Georges de Laire, Judicial Vicar could answer and affirm. Their interpretation of Vatican Council II and EENS woud be the same as that of the St. Benedict Center, NH.So they can end the prohibitions placed upon the religious community
All the religious communities in the Diocese of Manchester, USA could be asked these seven questions and they would agree with them. Even the LCWR Sisters would be in agreement with these seven questions as the two religious communities in Rome. Since they are common sense questions and indicate that Vatican Council II can be interpreted without a false premise and the conclusion supports exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church and the rest of Tradition.
Here are the seven questions which Bishop Peter Libasci the bishop of the diocese, Diane Quinlin, the Chancellor and the Rev. Georges de Laire, Judicial Vicar could also answer and affirm. Their interpretation of Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus woud be the same as that of the St. Benedict Center, NH.So they could end the prohibitions placed upon the religious community Slaves of the Immaculate Heart Mary at the St. Benedict Center.
SEVEN POINTS
1. LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II always refer to hypothetical, speculative and theoretical cases.So they are not practical exceptions to the exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church. There is no objective rupture with the Athanasius Creed which says all need Catholic faith for salvation.
2. They agree that Jesus died for all, salvation is open for all in potential but to receive this salvation all need to enter the Church, with faith and baptism(AG 7). The Church is necessary ( Dominus Iesus 20, CDF, Notification on Fr.Jacques Dupuis sj 2000 etc).
3. They interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise, just like me. LG 14, LG 16 etc are only hypothetical. They are not objective cases in 2021.
4. The baptism of desire(BDD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance (I.I) refer to only hypothetical cases. If any one has received salvation with BOD, BOB and I.I only God can know.
5.The Church teaches in Vatican Council II( without the false premise) that everyone who dies in 2021, without faith and baptism, are oriented to Hell in general, in principle.
6. It is a lie and deception when someone uses the false premise to interpret the Nicene Creed, Vatican Council II. Catechisms, the dogma EENS and BOD, BOB and I.I.
7. Catholics need to interpret Vatican Council II rationally and not irrationally. There is a rational option.-Lionel Andrades
https://www.catholicnh.org/worship-and-sacraments/vocations/religious/
_____________________
FEBRUARY 3, 2021
Religious communities would agree with me on seven points
The Franciscans of the Immaculate and the Brazilian community Joseleitos di Christo, both have been based in the Diocese of Porta Santa Rufina, Roma where Bishop Gino Reali, is the bishop.
The two religious communities with whom I have communicated in writing, would agree with the following seven points. So they would interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.
SEVEN POINTS
1. LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II always refer to hypothetical, speculative and theoretical cases.So they are not practical exceptions to the exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church. There is no objective rupture with the Athanasius Creed which says all need Catholic faith for salvation.
2. They agree that Jesus died for all, salvation is open for all in potential but to receive this salvation all need to enter the Church, with faith and baptism(AG 7). The Church is necessary ( Dominus Iesus 20, CDF, Notification on Fr.Jacques Dupuis sj 2000 etc).
3. They interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise, just like me. LG 14, LG 16 etc are only hypothetical. They are not objective cases in 2021.
4. The baptism of desire(BDD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance (I.I) refer to only hypothetical cases. If any one has received salvation with BOD, BOB and I.I only God can know.
5.The Church teaches in Vatican Council II( without the false premise) that everyone who dies in 2021, without faith and baptism, are oriented to Hell in general, in principle.
6. It is a lie and deception when someone uses the false premise to interpret the Nicene Creed, Vatican Council II. Catechisms, the dogma EENS and BOD, BOB and I.I.
7. Catholics need to interpret Vatican Council II rationally and not irrationally. There is a rational option.-Lionel Andrades
FEBRUARY 9, 2021
Why should the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary at the St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire, USA in the Diocese of Manchester, and other Catholics in the diocese, interpret Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) with a false premise ?
Why should the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary at the St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire, USA in the Diocese of Manchester, and other Catholics in the diocese, interpret Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) with a false premise ?
1.The baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance are hypothetical cases only - and they are always hypothetical.Why should Catholics say they are not hypothetical and so objective exceptions to Feeneyite EENS in 2021 ?
2.LG 8, LG 14, LG 16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are always hypothetical and theoretical cases only. Why should Catholics interpret them as being objective persons in the present times(1965-2021)saved outside the Church and so exceptions to Feeneyite EENS ?. -Lionel Andrades
_____________________
JANUARY 19, 2019
No denial from Father Georges de Laire : he affirms heresy in public and this is a scandal. The Holy Mass he offers is a sacrilege
1
JANUARY 13, 2019
All religious communities in the Diocese of Manchester, are obligated by the CDF and Bishop Libasci to affirm irrationality, heresy and sacrilege to be legally 'Catholic' and not have sanctions against them
JANUARY 13, 2019
JANUARY 12, 2019
JANUARY 11, 2019
JANUARY 11, 2019
CDF, Diocese of Manchester deception is not Catholic : nor ethical or honest even by secular standardsTheological Teaching of the St.Benedict Center unacceptable to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith
JANUARY 11, 2019
Traditionalist cites Vatican Council II in support of Tradition - the Restoration has begun- St.Benedict Center Status Change (31)
- ______________________________
No comments:
Post a Comment