If Bishop Robert Barron did not use the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II he would be, as he puts it, 'an extremist'.He would be a rad trad. In the same way if Pope Francis did not use the false premise to interpret the Council, he would emerge traditional.Since there would be no practical exceptions in the text of the Council to contradict EENS, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX

 If Bishop Robert Barron did not use the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II he would be, as he puts it, 'an extremist'.He would be a rad trad.

In the same way if Pope Francis did not use the false premise to interpret the Council, he would emerge traditional.Since there would be no practical exceptions in the text of the Council to contradict EENS, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX. -Lionel Andrades