Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican is not magisterial on Vatican Council II since he interprets the Council with the false premise, inference and conclusion instead of the rational and traditional option, in harmony with the past Magisterium of the Catholic Church. His Press Conferences , along with Archbishop Giacomo Morandi, Secretary of the CDF, seem null and void because of the objective error which could have been avoided. It could have been avoided since there are so many reports on the Internet correcting the mistake. - Lionel Andrades
Here is the interpretation of Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj, the present two popes and the Archbishop-Secretaries of the CDF, in red.
Fake premise
Lumen Gentium 8,Lumen Gentium 14, Lumen Gentium 16 etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically visible cases in 1965-2021.
Fake inference
They are objective examples of salvation outside the Church.
Fake conclusion
Vatican Council II contradicts the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).The Athanasius Creed(outside the Church there is no salvation) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism of return) were made obsolete.
Here is my interpretation of Vatican Council II in blue.
Rational Premise
LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically invisible cases in 1965-2021.They are only hypothetical and theoretical. They exist only in our mind and are not solid bodies at Newton's level of time, space and matter.
Rational Inference
They are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church for us human beings.
Rational Conclusion
Vatican Council II does not contradict EENS as it was interpreted by the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.It does not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS of St. Thomas Aquinas( saved in invincible ignorance is invisible), St. Augustine and Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.
The Letter of the Holy Office(Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) 1949 made an objective mistake.
___________________
Bishop Steven J.Lopes interprets Vatican Council II with the false premise, inference and conclusion.He would also be interpreting the Creeds and Catechisms with the same irrationality. This is an irregular issue. It is a canonical issue : he excommunicated Fr. Vaughn Treco for supporting Tradition and opposing the false interpretation of Vatican Council IIhttps://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/04/bishop-steven-jlopes-interprets-vatican.html
The faculty at the Augustine Institute, Colorado, USA now know that Vatican Council II can be interpreted rationally without the false premise but there is no announcement from them
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/04/the-faulty-at-augustine-institute.html
The faculty at the Augustine Institute, Graduate School in Colorado, USA use a false premise, inference and conclusion to interpret Vatican Council II.They are officially approved by U.S bishops who make the same objective error.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/04/the-augustine-institute-graduate-school.html
APRIL 11, 2021
Fr. Leonard Feeney, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and Archbishop Pierre Thuc did not know that Vatican Council II could be interpreted without the false premise, inference and conclusion
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/04/for-fr-leonard-feeney-and-archbishop.html
Feeneyites do not have to deny the baptism of desire since BOD is always invisible and hypothetical, it never was a practical exception to EENS
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/04/feeneyites-do-not-have-to-deny-baptism.html
Most of the material on Vatican Council II at the office of Cardinal Pietro Parolin, the Vatican Secretary of State and also at the library of the St. John Lateran University, Rome, is now obsolete
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/04/most-of-material-on-vatican-council-ii_53.html
Cardinal Luiz Ladaria s.j is in schism error needs to be recanted : Catholics have to affirm heresy and schism of the present Magisterium in the name of Vatican Council II interpreted with a false premise to elicit a non traditional and heretical conclusion which is a break with the past Magisterium of the Church.http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/sspx-begin-negotiations-with-abp-guido.html
Cardinal Luiz Ladaria s.j in schism : enforcing it on the whole Church
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/cardinal-luiz-ladaria-sj-in-schism.html
Cardinal Luiz Ladaria S.J Secretary of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith is still in heresy :visible to us baptism of desire and invincible ignorance contradicts a defined dogma http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/06/cardinal-luiz-ladaria-sj-secretary-of.html
THERE IS AMBIGUITY IN VATICAN COUNCIL II ONLY WITH THE FALSE PREMISE: THE COUNCIL IS TRADITIONAL OTHERWISE http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/06/there-is-ambiguity-in-vatican-council.html
Tuesday, April 10, 2012
HOLY FATHER ASSUMES THOSE SAVED IN INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE ARE KNOWN TO US: CONTRADICTS VATICAN COUNCIL I AND II
IF THE CDF DOES NOTHING WHOM CAN WE APPEAL TO, POPE FRANCIS ?: PUBLIC ERRORS BY VATICAN OFFICIALS INCLUDING THE CONGREGATION FOR THE DOCTRINE OF THE FAITH http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/05/if-cdf-does-nothing-whom-can-we-appeal.html
January 13, 2013
______________________
Vatican Council II , the Catechism of the Catholic Church and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus tell us outside the Church there is no salvation and Cardinal Ladaria says there is no more the superiority and exclusiveness of salvation in the Catholic Church
If Cardinal Luiz Ladaria s.j had used the For and Neutral to EENS approach Lumen Gentium 8 would not be a rupture with the old teaching on the superiority and exclusiveness of salvation in the Catholic Church
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/03/if-cardinal-luiz-ladaria-sj-had-used.html
The headline of Edward Pentin's report on the National Catholic Register is false.The Vatican has not affirmed the traditional teaching on salvation. Instead it has denied it.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/03/the-headline-of-edward-pentins-report.htmlCardinal Luiz Ladaria S.j has duped Catholic traditionalist bloggers and all of them are still clueless.http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/03/cardinal-luiz-ladaria-sj-has-duped.html
Traditionalist Veri Catholici interprets Vatican Council II with the for and against EENS method : so does Cardinal Luiz Ladaria
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/03/traditionalist-veri-catholici.html
Cardinal Luiz Ladaria takes the cake : What has 'the river of interpretations of Lumen Gentium 8 subsist it ' to do with EENS when they are all hypothetical and invisible cases?
Jesuit Cardinal Ladaria review the case of Jesuit Fr.Leonard Feeney he was set up by your office
Cardinal Ladaria made a major mistake at the Press Conference for Placuit Deo
Cardinal Luiz Ladaria chose to interpret Vatican Council II with the for and against EENS method instead of the for and neutral to EENS method : journalists and conservatives unaware
MARCH 2, 2018
The Letter (Placiut Deo) on non exclusive salvation is being faulted not so much for what it says but as for what it does not say and so allows heresy, schism and gnostism to flourish.
MARCH 1, 2018
Cardinal Ladaria presents a gnostic and heretical document which is a schism with the past popes and Magisterium
Will Pope Francis tomorrow(Thursday) say that there is known salvation outside the Church? : Cushingite document expected ?
___________________________
No comments:
Post a Comment