The faculty at the Augustine Institute, Colorado, USA now know that Vatican Council II can be interpreted rationally without the false premise but there is no announcement from them

 The faculty at the Augustine Institute, Colorado, USA now know that Vatican Council II can be interpreted rationally without the false premise but there is no announcement from them. There is no announcement from them which states that they will teach that the Council is in harmony with the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), since there are no exceptions mentioned in the Council-text. There are no practical exceptions in the Council-text to EENS since LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc refer to hypothetical cases only. They are not objective examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church in 1965-2021.The Council Fathers(1965) and the popes since 1965 have made an objective error. They overlooked the mistake in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston. It assumed unknown cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance were known exceptions to Feeneyite EENS. So it concluded heretically that not all people need to enter the Catholic Church for salvation.This was the beginning of the schism with the past Magisterium of the Catholic Church. It has now resulted in two interpretations of the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms. One interpretation is rational and the other irrational. - Lionel Andrades

Fake premise

Lumen Gentium 8,Lumen Gentium 14, Lumen Gentium 16 etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically visible cases in 1965-2021.

Fake inference

They are objective examples of salvation outside the Church.

Fake conclusion

Vatican Council II contradicts the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).The Athanasius Creed(outside the Church there is no salvation) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism of return) were made obsolete.

Rational Premise

LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically invisible cases in 1965-2021.They are only hypothetical and theoretical. They exist only in our mind and are not solid bodies at Newton's level of time, space and matter.

Rational Inference

They are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church for us human beings.

Rational Conclusion

Vatican Council II does not contradict EENS as it was interpreted by the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.It does not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS of St. Thomas Aquinas( saved in invincible ignorance is invisible), St. Augustine and Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.

The Letter of the Holy Office(Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) 1949 made an objective mistake.-Lionel Andrades

APRIL 11, 2021

The faculty at the Augustine Institute, Graduate School in Colorado, USA use a false premise, inference and conclusion to interpret Vatican Council II.They are officially approved by U.S bishops who make the same objective error.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/04/the-augustine-institute-graduate-school.html

APRIL 11, 2021

Fr. Leonard Feeney, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and Archbishop Pierre Thuc did not know that Vatican Council II could be interpreted without the false premise, inference and conclusion

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/04/for-fr-leonard-feeney-and-archbishop.html