Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke and the Lefebvrists are in practical schism with the past Magisterium when they use the false premise , inference and conclusion to create a non traditional conclusion. Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise and the cardinal goes along with it.

 Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke and the Lefebvrists are in practical schism with the past Magisterium when they use the false premise , inference and conclusion to create a non traditional conclusion.They are also in a rupture with a rational and Magisterial interpretation of Vatican Council II.Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise and the cardinal goes along with it.With the fake premise they change the understanding and meaning of the Nicene and Apostles Creed and reject the Athanasius Creed.

They re-interpret the baptism of desire(BOD) and invincible ignorance(I.I) with the false premise and so they project exceptions for Tradition.They are not Feeneyites.For them there are practical exceptions for the Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation.The same mistake is made by the liberals.

Since BOD and I.I refer to objective examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church in 1949-2021, they re-interpret the Catechisms irrationally.I do not make this mistake. 

To re-intepret the Creeds in a different way, as compared to the past centuries,is heresy.It is also schism with the past popes and saints.It is creating a rupture with the past Magisterium with the use of a false premise.It is the same as the liberals. This is the 'development of doctrine' of the liberal popes.

Since they interpret BOD and I.I with the false premise they create a false rupture with Feeneyite EENS or 16th century EENS. EENS is a de fide teaching of three Church Councils.EENS is also rejected by the liberals.

This was the mistake of Rahner, Cushing and Ratzinger at Vatican Council II.

Cardinal Burke and the Lefebvrists do not interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise, inference and conclusion and so remain in harmony with Tradition.It is the same as the liberals.

I have written about this before and there is no comment or denial from them.The liberals and Lefebvrists are in heresy and schism.The Lefebvrists cannot call themselves traditionalists.

Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre like Pope Paul VI was in schism with the past Magisterium. The Vatican Council II which he signed and approved,was based upon a false premise, inference and conclusion.

The rational alternative would be Magisterial and not a rupture with Tradition.

We have now discovered  the secret for the cause of the 'hermeneutic of rupture or continuity with Tradition'. We have discovered the missing link. We can avoid the rupture. It is simple.We avoid the false premise, we do not confuse what is invisible as being visible and every thing else will fall in place.-Lionel Andrades

MAY 21, 2021

Cardinal Raymond Burke , Lefebvrists in practical schism

 Summorum Pontificum approved Holy Mass in Latin but it was only allowed to be offered  by a priest who accepted the New Ecclesiiology created with the irrational interpretation of the baptism of desire, invincible ignorance, extra ecclesiam nulla salus, Vatican Council II, the Creeds and Catechisms.

This is how Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke offers Holy Mass.It is the same with Bishop Athanasius Schneider.

A Catholic can attend the Latin Mass as a Cushingite or Feeneyite.A Cushingite is someone  who interprets Magisterial documents with a false premise and a Feeneyite is someone who avoids this error with a rational interpretation.

A Catholic can also affirm the four marks of the Church as a Cushingite or Feeneyite. We can also recite the Profession of Faith as a Cushingite or Feeneyite and our conclusion will be different.It would be the same for the Oath of a Bishop or the Oath Against Modernism.

One is orthodox and the other modernist.

Lefebvrists are generally Cushingite. The liberals are also Cushingite. The New Theology depends upon Cushingism.

For the traditionalists, EENS, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors can be either Feeneyite or Cushingite.There are the traditionalists at the St. Benedict Centers and those of the SSPX.

Lefebvrists are modernists who make Magisterial documents obsolete.They are in practical schism and heresy.Yet they are called 'traditionalists'. -Lionel Andrades

____________________________

Fake premise

Lumen Gentium 8,Lumen Gentium 14, Lumen Gentium 16 etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically visible cases in 1965-2021.

Fake inference

They are objective examples of salvation outside the Church.

Fake conclusion

Vatican Council II contradicts the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).The Athanasius Creed(outside the Church there is no salvation) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism of return) were made obsolete.

Here is my interpretation of Vatican Council II in blue.

Rational Premise

LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically invisible cases in 1965-2021.They are only hypothetical and theoretical. They exist only in our mind and are not solid bodies at Newton's level of time, space and matter.

Rational Inference

They are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church for us human beings.

Rational Conclusion

Vatican Council II does not contradict EENS as it was interpreted by the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.It does not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS of St. Thomas Aquinas( saved in invincible ignorance is invisible), St. Augustine and Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.

The Letter of the Holy Office(Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) 1949 made an objective mistake.-Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/05/there-is-no-denial-from-congregation.html   

Lionel Andrades

Promoter of the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II.

Catholic lay man in Rome,

Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.

It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms.There can be two interpretations.

Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, non traditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional ?

Blog: Eucharist and Mission

E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com

____________________