Pope Francis called for unity in the church and rejection of the ideologies “that divide and separate us,” as he celebrated Mass in St. Peter’s Basilica on the feast of Pentecost. He told believers worldwide that “the Holy Spirit is telling the Church that today is the time for comforting.” - Pope Francis
https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2021/05/23/pope-francis-pentecost-homily-ideology-holy-spirit-240726
Pope Francis creates division in the Catholic Church when he interprets Vatican Council II, the Creeds, Councils, EENS etc with a false premise to create a non traditional conclusion.This is schism with the past popes and first class heresy according to Pope John Paul II (Ad Tuendem Fidem).This cannot be the teaching of the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit cannot make an objective mistake and also contradict the past Magisterium of the Catholic Church. The Holy Spirit cannot create a division in the Church with the 'liberal', 'progressivist' ideology with the New Theology created with the objective error of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949, the error repeated in Vatican Council II.
With the rational premise, inference and conclusion there would be no progressive/conservative division in theology. The New Theology is based on the objective error in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949. It projected invisible cases of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance as visible exceptions to traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus, which, Pope Francis rejects. This is the New Theology which Pope Francis accepts. With the false premise of the New Theology he creates division in the Catholic Church and calls it a ' development of doctrine'.This cannot be Magisterial.Catholics are not obliged to accept Pope Francis' non Magisterial and divisive interpretation of the Council.A rational and traditional alternative is available.It would not contradict the past ecclesiocentric ecclesiology of the Church, which the present two popes reject.-Lionel Andrades
https://www.churchmilitant.com/video/episode/vortex-fake-unity
Fake premise
Lumen Gentium 8,Lumen Gentium 14, Lumen Gentium 16 etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically visible cases in 1965-2021.
Fake inference
They are objective examples of salvation outside the Church.
Fake conclusion
Vatican Council II contradicts the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).The Athanasius Creed(outside the Church there is no salvation) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism of return) were made obsolete.
Here is my interpretation of Vatican Council II in blue.
Rational Premise
LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically invisible cases in 1965-2021.They are only hypothetical and theoretical. They exist only in our mind and are not solid bodies at Newton's level of time, space and matter.
Rational Inference
They are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church for us human beings.
Rational Conclusion
Vatican Council II does not contradict EENS as it was interpreted by the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.It does not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS of St. Thomas Aquinas( saved in invincible ignorance is invisible), St. Augustine and Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.
The Letter of the Holy Office(Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) 1949 made an objective mistake.-Lionel Andrades
Lionel Andrades
Promoter of the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II.
Catholic lay man in Rome,
Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms.There can be two interpretations.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, non traditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional ?
Blog: Eucharist and Mission
____________________
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment