We have to go back to the Catechism of the Council of Trent and the Baltimore Catechism and re-interpret the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance as not contradicting 16 th century extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS)

 We have to go back to the Catechism of the Council of Trent and the Baltimore Catechism and re-interpret the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance as not contradicting 16 th century extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).

There are no practical exceptions to EENS.Since we humans cannot physically see anyone saved outside the Church. We cannot personally know of any one saved without faith and  the baptism of water.No one saw a St.Emerentiana in Heaven without the baptism of water.St. Emerentiana is a saint, yes, but who saw her in Heaven without the baptism of water? If she is in Heaven, as we believe she is,  then she had received the baptism of water.

We also have to re-interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc  rationally in Vatican Council II.Otherwise there is a rupture between faith and reason. A new liberalism is justified in theology, with the creation of a false premise, inference and conclusion.-Lionel Andrades