Bishop Athanasius Schneider did not support Brother Andre Marie MICM on a doctrinal issue

Bishop Athanasius Schneider did not come out in support of Brother Andre Marie MICM, Prior at the St.Benedict Center, New Hampshire, when a Decree of Prohibitions was placed upon the religious community, the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, by the Diocese of Worcester and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF).The issue was doctrinal.

He could not support them in public since he uses the New Theology to interpret extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and Vatican Council II(VC2), like the present two popes.

As I have mentioned before, Bishop Schneider,officially accepts and interprets VC 2 and EENS with the false premise ( invisible cases of LG 16( being saved in invincible ignorance)are physically visible in the present times)and so his conclusion is non traditional( There are practical and known exceptions for the Athanasius Creed, EENS, Syllabus of Errors etc. So they are made obsolete).This is schism with the past popes on EENS .

For the popes over the centuries the baptism of desire(BOD) and invincible ignorance(I.I) were always physically invisible. This is common sense.

Bishop Schneider also accepts the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 (LOHO).It projects unknown and invisible cases of BOD and I.I as being known and visible exceptions to the strict interpretation of EENS.So with EENS allegedly contradicted LOHO concluded that not every one needs to enter the Catholic Church for salvation.This is a heretical and schismatic conclusion based upon irrational reasoning.It is officially accepted by Bishop Athanasius Schneider.

So in public Bishop Schneider could not affirm Feneeyite EENS like the St.Benedict Cente,NH and neither could be interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with EENS and Tradition.Heinterprets LG 16 as a break with Tradition and faults the Council.He is really a liberal on this point too.-Lionel Andrades