At Dijon, France the laity must by re-educated.

 

At Dijon, France the laity must be re-educated.With bad theology Bishop Roland Minnerath maintains ‘ a parallel Church’ and the people like helpless  sheep, go along. Even the religious communities FSSP, Carmelites etc can do nothing. If they were not ignorant the priests and laity would publically inform Bishop Minnerath that he needs to affirm Vatican Council II interpreted  rationally, in harmony with the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius XII.Vatican Council II can have a hermeneutic of continuity with the Athanasius Creed.He needs to follow Jesus, the Bible and the past popes.

Keep theology out of politicis or politics out of theology by avoiding the false premise used to reject Tradition.Affirm the Council and the Creeds the bishops could be told.

Pope Francis is not Magisterial on Vatican Council II when his premise, inference and conclusion are irrational.The bishop must be told that the pope needs to change his premise to be Magisterial and in harmony with the past Magisterium.

The people will have to tell the bishop what the bishop will not tell them.They would have to point to Jesus, the Bible and past popes.

The laity do not know that there is no unity in the diocese ; no unity with the past Magisterium, on the First Commandment, the Creeds and Catechisms.This must be the result when a fake premise is employed in theology.

The issue at Dijon is not only the Latin Mass but evangelisation, ecumenism, ecclesiology, catechesis etc. When the bishop rejects the old ecclesiology he has to be divisive with deception.It is artificial, calculated, if  he knows that he is using a fake premise. His concept of Jesus is not traditional.There is a rupture with the saints' interpretation of the Bible.

But how will the people know about the fake premise, inference and non traditional conclusion?The bishop is not going to tell them ( that is if he himself knows about it).Even the FSSP  use the fake premise at their seminary, to interpret Vatican Council II, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus etc.They interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise, but unlike Bishop Roland Minnerath and the liberals, they reject the non traditional conclusion.

Only the few people  who read this blog ( eucharistandmission) know what I am saying. They agree with me. The other day there was an unexpected positive note from way out Japan. We are now Catholics who interpret Vatican Council II differently. We are not liberals, Lefebvrists, Thucs or Feeneyites on Vatican Council II.They did not know about the false premise.It was common for Bishop Bernard Fellay to interpret Vatican Council II with the irrationality.

At Dijon, the laity must by re-educated.-Lionel Andrades