Pope Francis wants those priests who offer the Latin
Mass like the FSSP, to also offer the Novus Ordo Mass with ‘the theology of
religions’ and not the old ecclesiology of the Church, which did not use the
common false premise.
Bishop Roland Minnerath, who
has written a book on the Theology of Religions, also wants the FSSP priests to
concelebrate at the Novus Ordo Mass and offer the Latin Mass with this
theology, which is a rupture with the past.
This is not really an issue if
the FSSP decides to interpret Vatican Council II with the rational premise,
inference and conclusion.It will be the end of the theology of religions since
Vatican Council II will be dogmatic.It will support the strict interpretation
of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) with hypothetical
cases of LG 8,LG 14,LG16,UR 3,NA2, GS 22 etc, not being practical exceptions to
EENS in 2021.So Ad Gentes 7, which says all need faith and baptism for
salvation, will not be contradicted by LG 14( baptism of desire) and LG 16(
invincible ignorance).The norm for salvation will be AG 7 and not NA 2 or LG 8
etc.
The FSSP priests and laity can
then affirm the Athanasius Creed which says all need the Catholic faith for
salvation and ask Bishop Roland Minnerath and the diocesan priests to do the
same.
With the theology of
religions, Pope Francis, Pope Benedict and Bishop Minnerath, are bringing
division into the Church at Dijon.We cannot throw away the old ecclesiology of
the Church by re-interpreting Church documents, irrationally.
THE BOOKS OF BISHOP MINNERATH
ARE OBSOLETE WITH THE FALSE PREMISE
The laity must note that
Bishop Minnerath’s books on Vatican Council II, ecclesiology,concordats etc are
obsolete.Since he has written them interpreting the Council and other Magisterial
documents with the common false premise which creates a fake rupture with the
Tradition, which they uphold.
Without the false premise, the
Orthodox Christians, with whom the bishop dialogues for the Congregation for
the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF), would be outside the Church without Catholic
faith(AG 7).The Council would also not contradict the dogma EENS.
Even though there are good and
holy things in other religions (NA 2) the religions are not paths to salvation
(AG 7) and all need faith and baptism (AG 7) to avoid Hell ( for salvation).
CONCORDATS WITHOUT THE
SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE
In his books on Concordats,
Bishop Minnerath has not stated that since outside the Church there is no
salvation according to Vatican Council II and past Magisterial
documents(Syllabus of Errors etc), the State should be Catholic with no
separation of Church and State.Concordats must not support a secular and
Satanic state.
THERE IS AN OBJECTIVE ERROR IN
THE LETTER OF THE HOLY OFFICE 1949
Bishop Minnerath and the
diocesan priests who offer the Novus Ordo Mass must affirm the dogma EENS since
there are no exceptions to EENS in Vatican Council II but also because the
Letter of the Holy Office(CDF) 1949, which made an objective error, is not a
Magisterial document, even though it is referenced in Vatican Council II and
inserted in the Denzinger.The Holy Spirit cannot make an objective mistake.
The lay Catholics in Dijon
must be allowed to affirm traditional ecclesiocentism without wrongly
projecting Vatican Council II as being in conflict with it.
THEY NEED TO INTERPRET VATICAN
COUNCIL II WITHOUT THE FALSE PREMISE LIKE LIONEL ANDRADES
They must Vatican Council II
according to Lionel Andrades, and there would no more be a theological division
in the Church, now expressed by the Mass.The whole Church will have to return
to Tradition.Since there would be only one option in the interpretation of
Magisterial documents-the rational one.The traditional leftist/divsion will not
be there since the Council will be dogmatic and traditional. This though could
disappoint the progressivists, who depend on the irrationality to create a
hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition.Cardinals Kasper and Koch will no more be
able to cite Vatican Council II.
When the Council is
traditional- and affirms the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and EENS- then
collegiality, religious liberty and ecumenism are no more an issue for
conservative Catholics.
THE NEW ECUMENISM IS
THEOLOGICALLY CREATED ONLY WITH THE FALSE PREMISE
If the new bishop in Dijon
continues to support the New Ecumenism and the New Theology then he is creating
division.Since the New Ecumenism and the New Theology can only be created with
the false premise.This is heretical.It is also schism with the past Magisterium.
THE BISHOP IS FOLLOWING THE
LETTER 1949 WHICH IS HERETICAL AND OFFICIAL
The bishop will be following
the objective error in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which says that every
one does not need to be a formal member of the Catholic Church.Since, it is
implied, that there are visible cases of persons saved with the baptism of
desire(BOD) and invincible ignorance(I.I) who are practical exceptions to
Feeneyite EENS.This is specious reasoning.
According to the Letter the need for the baptism of water is not absolute always.Since there are practical exceptions of the BOD and I.I which make the baptism of water relative.The alleged ‘necessity of means’ depends upon a possibility which exists only in our mind and in reality is a ‘zero case’ but is projected as personally known and objective cases at Newton’s level of matter.
This is the fake reasoning of
the LOHO which Cardinal Ratzinger as Prefect of the Congregation for the
Doctrine of the Faith,CDF, used to create a New Theology in the Catholic Church
and which is being followed today by Pope Francis, the CDF and Bishop
Minnerath. -Lionel Andrades
JUNE 30, 2021
Interpretation of Vatican Council II by Bishop Roland Minnerath and Lionel Andrades
INTERPRETATION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II BY BISHOP ROLAND MINNERATH AND LIONEL ANDRADES
Bishop Roland Minnerath has interpreted Vatican Council II with the false premise and with this error has written a book on 'the theology of religions' he has also interpreted the Syllabus of Errors with a false premise and published books with this error which now are obsolete. Bishop Roland Minnerath uses the fake premise, inference and conclusion to interpret Vatican Council II and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.So there is a rupture with Tradition. If he used the rational premise, inference and conclusion there would be no rupture with Tradition.
So his books are obsolete. They were written with a false premise to create a non traditional conclusion.
With the false premise he changes the original interpretation of the Creeds,Catechisms and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.With the rational premise he would emerge a traditionalist like the FSSP. The FSSP reject Vatican Council II interpreted with the false premise and go back to traditional sources of the Catholic Church.
FAKE PREMISE OF BISHOP ROLAND MINNERATH
Lumen Gentium 8,Lumen Gentium 14, Lumen Gentium 16 etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically visible cases in 1965-2021.
FAKE INFERENCE OF BISHOP ROLAND MINNERATH
They are objective examples of salvation outside the Church.
FAKE CONCLUSION OF BISHOP ROLAND MINNERATH
Vatican Council II contradicts the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).The Athanasius Creed(outside the Church there is no salvation) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism of return) were made obsolete.
Here is my interpretation of Vatican Council II in blue.
RATIONAL PREMISE OF LIONEL ANDRADES
LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically invisible cases in 1965-2021.They are only hypothetical and theoretical. They exist only in our mind and are not solid bodies at Newton's level of time, space and matter.
RATIONAL INFERENCE OF LIONEL ANDRADES
They are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church for us human beings.
RATIONAL CONCLUSION OF LIONEL ANDRADES
Vatican Council II does not contradict EENS as it was interpreted by the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.It does not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS of St. Thomas Aquinas( saved in invincible ignorance is invisible), St. Augustine and Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.
The Letter of the Holy Office(Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) 1949 made an objective mistake it used the false premise, inference and conclusion.-Lionel Andrades
June 29, 2021
Bishop Roland Minnerath has interpreted Vatican Council II with the false premise and with this error has written a book on 'the theology of religions' he has also interpreted the Syllabus of Errors with a false premise and published books with this error
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/06/bishop-roland-minnerath-has-interpreted
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment