Vatican Council II has to be interpreted with a rational premise, inference and conclusion otherwise, with the common false premise, it has to be a betrayal of Tradition and the « true Church »

 

Pope Francis writes,  says Dr.Joseph Shaw,that the use of the 1962 Missal is

often characterized by a rejection not only of the liturgical reform, but of the Vatican Council II itself, claiming, with unfounded and unsustainable assertions, that it betrayed the Tradition and the “true Church”.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/who-is-pope-francis-punishing

This is true. I agree with Pope Francis.However he is not aware that Vatican Council II has to be interpreted with a rational premise, inference and conclusion otherwise, with the common false premise, it has to be a betrayal of Tradition and the « true Church ». Since with the false premise, the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, the Catechism of Pope Pius X (24 Q,27Q) and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to the Jesuits in the 16th century are rejected.So a false Church is created.-Lionel Andrades

JULY 19, 2021

The official interpretation of Vatican Council II is schismatic . We’ve found the bug.It’s a deceptive, subtle false premise which escaped everyone’s notice.It was always there before us like a germ that spreads and brings on an epidemic.The discovery is our vaccination.Those who know - are immune even when schismatic popes suffer from the contagion.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/07/the-official-interpretation-of-vatican_19.html

JULY 18, 2021

The official interpretation of Vatican Council II is schismatic

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/07/the-official-interpretation-of-vatican.html

JULY 18, 2021

Every good Catholic needs to reject Vatican Council II interpreted with the false premise. It is unethical.

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/07/every-good-catholic-needs-to-reject.html

 JULY 18, 2021

Like his previous documents, Pope Francis has once again in Traditionis Custode, interpreted Vatican Council II with the false premise.The violation of the Principle of Non Contradiction cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/07/like-his-previous-documents-pope.html

 JULY 17, 2021

An appeal could be made to political leaders to ask Pope Francis to interpret Vatican Council II rationally and then admit that the Novus Ordo Mass has the same ecclesiology as the Traditional Latin Mass of the 16th century.

For Archbishop Thomas E. Gullickson, Fr. Stefano Visinti osb, the Brazilian Fr. Nevus Marcello O.P, the American apologist at EWTN John Martignoni the baptism of desire(BOD) and invincible ignorance(I.I) are not objective exceptions to 16^th century extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).Martignoni refers to BOD and I.I as ‘zero cases’ in our reality.But for the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF), the Rome Vicariate  and the politcal Left, BOD and I.I are objective exceptions to EENS, the Syllabus of Errors and the Athanasius Creed.In other words what is invisible is visible. This is the false premise which creates the New Theology and is at the foundation of Pope Francis, Pope Benedict and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria’s interpretation of Vatican Council II and the Creeds and Catechisms.A New Theology based upon an objective error cannot be Magisterial. It cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit.

It is irrational, heretical and schismatic but it is official theology approved by the popes and Alberto Melloni of the Bologna School,financed by the Italian Government. It is ideology enforced by the leftist President Sergio Matarella and Prime Minister Mario Dragi.

If they were asked to interpret Vatican Council, EENS, the Creeds, Catechisms and BOD and I.I with the rational premise, inference and conclusion they would refuse to do so. Since they would have to return to Tradition which they now associated with only the Traditional Latin Mass and not the Novus Ordo Mass.

The New Ecumenism, New Evangelisation, New Ecclesiology etc has its base in the interpretation of Vatican Council II with the fake premise . Now Pope Francis has issued a new document “TRADITIONIS CUSTODES”

based upon the same false interpretation of the Council and he considers it Magisterial. The ban on the Latin Mass is political like the interpretation of Vatican Council II with the fake premise.

An appeal could be made to political leaders to ask Pope Francis to interpret Vatican Council II rationally and then admit that the Novus Ordo Mass has the same ecclesiology as the Traditional Latin Mass of the 16th century.-Lionel Andrades

 

Archbishop Thomas E.Gullickson says Vatican Council II does not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/11/archbishop-thomas-egullickson-says.html#links

DEAN OF THEOLOGY AT ST. ANSELM SAYS THERE ARE NO KNOWN EXCEPTIONS TO THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/10/dean-of-theology-at-st-anselm-says.html#links

 

CANTATE DOMINO, COUNCIL OF FLORENCE ON EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS IS DE FIDE AND NOT CONTRADICTED BY VATICAN COUNCIL II- Fr. Nevus Marcello O.Phttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2011/07/cantate-domino-council-of-florence-on.html
____________________________

INTERNATIONAL THEOLOGICAL COMMISSION USES PREMISE THAT IS FACTUALLY INCORRECT : LIMBO

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/03/international-theological-commission_29.html

The International Theological Commission's position paper Christianity and the World Religions 1997 has an objective factual error and is approved by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger : invincible ignorance is not an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salushttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/03/international-theological-commissions.html

INTERNATIONAL THEOLOGICAL COMMISSION ASSUMES ‘SEEDS OF THE WORD’ (VATICAN COUNCIL II ) IN OTHER RELIGIONS ARE KNOWN TO US AND THIS IS AN EXPLICIT EXCEPTION TO THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUShttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/03/international-theological-commission.html

VATICAN'S INTERNATIONAL THEOLOGICAL COMMISSION MAKES AN ERROR IN ITS POSITION PAPER CHRISTIANITY AND THE WORLD RELIGIONShttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/03/vaticans-international-theological.html

VATICAN COUNCIL II(Feeneyite) REJECTS THE THEOLOGY OF RELIGIONShttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/03/vatican-council-ii-rejects-theology-of.html

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/07/there-are-two-interpretations-of.html

Former Secretary of the International Theological Commission holds that those saved with the baptism of desire and in invincible ignorance are known to us and so an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salushttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/02/secretary-of-international-theological.html#links

BISHOP GERHARD MULLER MADE TWO FUNDAMENTAL MISTAKES ON VATICAN COUNCIL II: HE ASSUMED LG 16 CONTRADICTS EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS AND HE DID NOT KNOW AG 7 SUPPORTS THE DOGMAhttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/07/bishop-gerhard-muller-made-two.html#links

 

Archbishop Augustine Di Noia says the Holy Spirit preserves the Church from error including the interpretation of Vatican Council II- we now know there are two interpretations of Vatican Council II, which one is guided by the Holy Spirit ?http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/07/archbishop-augustine-di-noia-says-that.html#links
________________________ 

 

In 2018 the Padre Pio Prayer groups, Neo Cathechumenal Way of Kiko Arguello, the Catholic Charismatic Renewal Movement, all the religious communities(Franciscans, Dominicans, Carmelities), the diocesan priests and the bishops and cardinals  choose the irrational column in the interpretation of Vatican Council II, the Catechism of the Catholic Church  and the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston. The priests and professors who teach at the pontifical and secular universities and seminaries in Rome, make the same mistake.

So wide spread is the error and there is no one discussing it .Neither over the years has Pope Benedict issued a correction and apology.

JANUARY 27, 2018

THE TWO COLUMNS

Pope Francis interprets the Creeds with a false premise, inference and conclusion. This was un precedented over the centuries.

Pope Pius XII and Pope John XXIII and the following popes, interpreted extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) with a false premise.Pope Paul VI and the following popes interpreted Vatican Council II with the false premise.

Now Pope Francis interprets the Creeds and Vatican Council Ii with the false premise and so creates a hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition on ecumenism, traditional ecclesiocentic mission, liturgy with the old exclusivist ecclesiology and traditional ecclesiology.It's a different Catholic Church now.The whole Church is following him in the error, conservatives and liberals.

Bishop Schneider, Maike Hickson and John Henry Weston continue to interpret LG 8 and UR 3 in Vatican Council II as exceptions to EENS. Bishop Bernard Fellay  did this continously. He never corrected himself. He probably will go to the end of his life, with this error, like Fr.Nicholas Gruner   and John Vennari.

If the popes interpret the Creeds without the false premise, like me,  they would be opposed by the Jewish Left.There would be persecution.Now there is support.

The two popes do not affirm the Creeds to avoid a persecution of the Church. They have changed the faith-teachings of the Church.

So the official Profession of Faith and Oath of Office for Cardinals, Bishops, Rectors, Superiors and Parish Priests are mere words supporting heresy and dissent.

-Lionel Andrades