There cannot be a Restoration in the Church because the Lefebvrists are the biggest asset of the progressivists. Pope Francis in Traditionis Custode interpreted Vatican Council II like the both of them

 

There is not a single report on Traditionis Custode which informs Pope Francis that all the books on Vatican Council II are written with a fake premise instead of a rational premise, inference and traditional conclusion.

Peter Kwasniewski did not mention it in his talk at Denver and he recommended books by the Lefebvrists,who also do not interpret Vatican Council II with the rational premise.They are politically correct like the liberals.

Kwasniewski uses a false premise to create a fake rupture with Tradition and does not deny it since this is expected of him, by the Left. If the other Lefebvrists ( Schneider, Mattei, Marshall, Vigano, Matt and Burke) did not use the fake premise to interpret Vatican Council II they would be affirming extra ecclesiam nulla salus( with no exceptions mentioned in the Council-text), the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( with no exceptions for an ecumenism of return) and the Athanasius Creed ( which is no more contradicted by Lumen Gentium).

If they are rational on Vatican Council II then they know that they will be persecuted like the St. Benedict Center, NH, USA.

So the alleged traditionalists have compromised and do not write or talk about Vatican Council II interpreted with a rational premise.

Don Pietro Leone  on Rorate Caeili does not make the invisible-visible distinction when writing on Vatican Council II in harmony with the popes . Sometimes it is said or asked ,in correspondence, ‘Why should we make the invisible-visible distinction? And I respond, ‘ You are already making the invisible-visible distinction unknowingly. I am calling attention to it. If LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II are exceptions for Feeneyite EENS or the Syllabus of Errors for you, then in your mind you project them as being visible’.If LG 8, LG 16 etc were invisible cases in 2021, as they are for me, then the Lefebvrists and liberals would be affirming the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24Q,27Q) with invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire not being exceptions. The Catechism would not contradict itself.

We cannot physically and visibly, in Newton’s time and space, see someone  saved in invincible ignorance. It can only be known to God.

For Bishop Donald Sanborn and the sedevacantists CMRI and MHFM, Vatican Council II is a rupture with Tradition. So they are telling us that LG 8, LG 16, UR 3 etc refer to physically visible cases of salvation outside the Catholic Church, in specfic and known cases, in 1965-2021. This is the New Theology of the liberals and the popes.It is also shared by Peter Kwasniewski.

There cannot be a Restoration in the Church because the Lefebvrists are the biggest asset of the progressivists. Pope Francis in Traditionis Custode interpreted Vatican Council II like the both of them.-Lionel Andrades