There is an objective and factual error in Eric Sammons new book Deadly Indifference. His Salvation
Spectrum is based upon the irrational premise he uses to interpret Vatican
Council II.Without the objective mistake in the interpretation of Vatican
Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus he would be left with only the ‘absolutist’
interpretation, in his spectrum.Now he supports the New Theology.
Secondly Fr. Leonard Feeney was not condemned for his strict interpretation
of EENS. The excommunication was lifted with him having to recite the
Athanasius Creed which says all need Catholic faith for salvation. Vatican
Council II has the same message. Ad Gentes 7 states all need faith
and baptism for salvation.
So if he interpreted the Council II and EENS rationally there would be no
‘ongoing debate on extra ecclesiam nulla
salus’ as he has titled a report on Crisis Magazine.
In order to make the Salvation Spectrum more understandable, I’ve created a chart to lay out the various views:
https://www.crisismagazine.com/2021/the-ongoing-debate-over-extra-ecclesiam-nulla-salus
If Eric Sammons interpreted Vatican Council II and EENS like Lionel Andrades and not the liberal professor of theology, Gavin D’Costa at the University of Bristol, England his interpretation would be rational and traditional. Now it is liberal and still political, like that of Joseph Shaw, John Rao, the late Mons. Brunero Gherardino and Jim Russel the liberal contributor to Crisis Magazine.They all accept the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 from which Sammons gets his New Theology. The Letter employs the false premise to produce schism and heresy which is officially approved by the popes.-Lionel Andrades
Lionel Andrades
Promoter of the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II.Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral.
Catholic lay man in Rome,
Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms.There can be two interpretations.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, non traditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional ?
Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission )
E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com
___________________
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment