Even Pope Benedict interprets Vatican Council II schismatically with the false premise.With this public scandal he offers Holy Mass and promotes his schismatic books on Vatican Council II, Ecclesiology

 

Even Pope Benedict interprets Vatican Council II schismatically with the false premise and with this public scandal offers Holy Mass and promotes his schismatic books on Vatican Council II, Ecclesiology etc.

For Pope Benedict extra ecclesiam nulla salus in 2021 is not the same as EENS in the 16^th century. Vatican Council II, interpreted with the false premise has made it obsolete.This is Pope Benedict’s official schism with the use of a false premise.Without the fake premise he would be a Feeneyite.

So he allowed all the bishops in the USA, the entire USCCB,to interpret Vatican Council II like Cardinal Richard Cushing i.e with the lie.

If Pope Paul VI had interpreted Vatican Council II with the rational premise in 1965,then Pope Benedict would not be able to say that EENS today is no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16^th century.There would be no room for liberalism.

The SSPX should ask Pope Benedict and Ecclesia Dei’s Archbishop Augustine de Noia for an apology.They wanted the SSPX to interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise and accept the non traditional conclusion in exchange for canonical recognition.

Pope Benedict did not tell them that there were no literal cases of LG 14 ( baptism of desire) as Bishop Athanasius Schneider mentioned in an interview with Dr. Taylor Marshall.He did not tell them that LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA2, GS 22 etc were all hypothetical and theoretical cases, they were not references to real people saved outside the Catholic Church in the present times.

Brother Francis Maluf one of the pioneer members of Fr. Leonard Feeney’s religious Order, Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, and Superior of the Saint Benedict Center, Richmond, New Hampshire,USA met Cardinal Ratzinger in Rome.He did not tell Brother Francis that there were no literal exceptions: no practical exceptions to Feeneyite EENS, mentioned in Vatican Council II.He could have told him that Fr. Leonard Feeney was correct and the Holy Office 1949 wrong. Since there were no literal cases of the baptism of desire.

Archbishop Augustine Di Noia, Ad junct, Secretary of the CDF and formerly Vice President of the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei, told Brother Andre Marie MICM, Prior, Saint Benedict Center, New Hampshire, that he had to interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church 847-848 ( invincible ignorance) as a literal case of salvation outside the Church in the present times.He had to see it as a practical exception to Feeneyite EENS.Di Noia approved the Diocese of Manchester's  Decree of Prohibitions against the traditionalist community.

This is official schism from Pope Benedict and the CDF created with a fake premise.-Lionel Andrades