Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre did not know

 

Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre did not know  that Vatican Council II taught that there was exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church (Ad Gentes 7 ) and so was dogmatic . He did not know that hypothetical cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc did not contradict AG 7 and the Catechism of Pope Pius X, 24Q,27Q.

So Vatican Council II was not a break with the Council of Trent on extra ecclesiam nulla salus etc.

Also he did not know that when the Catechism of the Council of Trent and the Catechism of Pope Pius X mentioned implicit the baptism of desire it did not contradict Cantate Domino, Council of Florence 1441, on EENS. This was also not known to the SSPX bishops, especially Bishop Bernard Fellay.Fellay issued many statements on the Council in which he made an error.

So now lay supporters of the SSPX at the Latin Mass, project exceptions for the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors and EENS. The mistake in there in the official website of the SSPX (See Feeneyism).-Lionel Andrades

OCTOBER 17, 2021

The SSPX have to admit that they have made a mistake in the interpretation of the Catechism of Pope Pius X and the Syllabus of Errors. The same mistake they made in the interpretation of Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

 

Being saved in invincible ignorance is an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) for Archbishop Lefebvre and the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX).

The Syllabus of Errors affirms EENS.

The Syllabus of Errors also affirms an ecumenism of return.

The Syllabus of Errors also affirms the past exlusivist ecclesiology upon which was based the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King.

So when invincible ignorance is assumed to be known-people saved outside the Church it would be an exception to the Syllabus of Errors on EENS.

So the Catechism of Pope Pius X would contradict the Syllabus of Errors for Archbishop Lefebvre.

The Catechism of Pope Pius X would also contradict itself for Archbishop Lefebvre. 

Since this Catechism says all need to be members of the Church for salvation. It does not state that invincible ignorance is an exception to all needing to be members of the Church.But this is how Archbishop Lefebvre and the present SSPX and liberal Cushingites would interpret it.

For the SSPX in the Catechism of the Catholic Church n.1257( The Necessity of Baptism) would also contradict itself. Since it says the Church knows of no means to eternal beatiude other than the baptism of water and also says God is not limited to the Sacraments.

So the SSPX have to admit that they have made a mistake in the interpretation of the Catechism of Pope Pius X and the Syllabus of Errors. The same mistake they made in the interpretation of Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus.-Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/10/cardinal-marx-and-michael-matt-editor.html