Dr. Taylor Marshall in his latest,new video says that in the past if you would go against the mainstream Church you would be a heretic. True. Since they had the Faith from the Apostles. It was the one, true and holy Church.The Holy Spirit guided the Church and the Magisterium was obedient.But now it is the official Church, which is in heresy.The popes and ecclesiastics are in a break with the past Magisterium with the use of the False Premise

From the time 12.00 in the video above  Dr. Taylor Marshall mentions the New Theology and the False Premise used to interpret the baptism of desire. 

This is a source of other heresies for me. 

It also changes the understanding of the First Commandment and the Nicene and Apostles Creed. It outright rejects the Athanasius Creed.This is heresy in 2021.It is official.It is coming from the top to the bottom.

It is official in Germany and the Vatican.The New Theology has created two interpretations of Vatican Council II in the whole Catholic Church. One interpretation is rational and the other irrational, heretical and a break with the past Magisterium.With the Rational Premise, in the interpretation of Vatican Council II the popes, cardinals and bishops would have to go back to the traditional strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, an Athansius Creed with no known exceptions and a Syllabus of Error of Pope Pius X with no exceptions.But do they want to do that ?

They do not want to talk about this in Germany.Since it would mean that Cardinal Marx would have to affirm the past ecclesiocentrism of the Church and then be opposed, instead of supported by the Left, as at present.

.

Dr. Taylor Marshall in his latest,new video says that in the past if you would go against the mainstream Church you would be a heretic. True. Since they had the Faith from the Apostles. It was the one, true and holy Church.The Holy Spirit guided the Church and the Magisterium was obedient.But now it is the official Church, which  is in heresy.The popes and ecclesiastics are in a  break with the past Magisterium, with the use of the False Premise.

Even in a secular discussion if you use a False Premise the conclusions would be different. If I am talking about the New Physics with a group of scientists and if I believe that the moon is the sun and is seen during the day and it gives light then my conclusions would be different from the others, in the group.

A False Premise was used in the Church to create a kind of apostasy. It is universal.

The currect crisis is worse(timing 3:08) says Bishop Athanasius Schneider. "It is universal", he says.True. The False Premise and the New Theology has spread throughout the Church and the ecclesiastics have not corrected it by saying that there are no literal cases of the  baptism of desire. There are no literal cases in 1965-2021 of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc.

So today the popes reject the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( with no exceptions ) as it was known over the centuries.They use the False Premise.

They reject the Athanasius Creed which says all need the Catholic faith for salvation. There are exceptions created with the New Theology and the False Premise.

They changed the Nicene and Apostles Creed with the same False Premise.

They interpret Vatican Council II with the False  Premise instead of the Rational Premise and so the conclusion is non traditional instead of traditional.This is something obvious today for any one to check.

The Catechism of Pope Pius X 24 Q, 27 Q affirms the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS but when it mentions invincible ignorance, then this is interpreted with the False Premis. So invincible ignorance etc would contradict 24Q and 27 Q on outside the Church there is no salvation.

The first part of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 affirms traditional EENS and the second part posits the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance as exceptions for the first past. Again the False Premise is in operation.

It is the same with the Catechism of the Catholic Church, n.846 Outside the Church No Salvation and n.1257 The Necessity of Baptism.

Based upon the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II and the resulting liberalism in the Church Pope Francis has justified Amoris Laetitia, the Abu Dhabi Statement, Traditionis Custode etc.This official division. It is coming from the top. It is liberalism based upon an irrationality which is official but not Magisterial.

The one, true, holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church still exists in the Catholic Church when the False Premise is avoided, wherever it is avoided. In other words, where the New Theology has been made obsolete.-Lionel Andrades