There was an impediment in the elections of Pope Francis as pope

There was an impediment in the elections of Pope Francis as pope. According to Canon Law the pope and cardinal have to be a Catholic.He must affirm the Catholic Faith, in faith and morals.Officially, in discipline and doctrine, Pope Francis did not meet this condition.

He interpreted the Creeds and Catechisms with a False Premise ( invisible cases are physically visible in 2021.There are literal and practical cases of  LG 14,LG 16 etc in the present times). In this way he created a fake rupture with Tradition.His Fake Premise was that theoretical and speculative cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22, AG 11( seeds of the Word) etc, were really objective and seen-in-the- flesh people.So they were made explicit exceptions  for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX( ecumenism of return to the Catholic Church).His non traditional conclusion was that Vatican Council II was a break with Tradition, when really, the Council interpreted with the Rational Premise ( invisible people are invisible in 2021) would be in harmony with the past ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church, the exclusivist ecclesiology of , for example, the missionaries and Magisterium from the 12^th to 16^th century.

The Conclave elected Pope Francis when he rejected the Athanasius Creed with the Irrational Premise.The Athanasius Creed says all need the Catholic faith for salvation but with the False Premise, exceptions are created.Common sense tells us that there cannot be exceptions.But Pope Francis has to use the False Premise  since he does not want to affirm the traditional strict interpretation of EENS ( with no exceptions).

Even as a cardinal and the Superior of the Jesuits in Argentina, he had changed the understanding of the Nicene and Apostles Creed with the falsity.The Jesuits were doing the same since the time of the case of Fr. Leonard Feeney and the heresy of  Pope Pius XII, Cardinal Richard Cushing and the Jesuit Provincial Superior in the USA.The Jesuit Rector of Boston College was in heresy and he expelled three professors for not affirming EENS with the False Premise. He wanted them to say that there were literal cases of the baptism of desire, personally known-people in Boston at that time,saved without ‘faith and baptism’(AG 7).1

Therefore, that one may obtain eternal salvation, it is not always required that he be incorporated into the Church actually as a member, but it is necessary that at least he be united to her by desire and longing.- Letter of the Holy Office 1949  

 Unknown and invisible cases of the baptism of desire were projected as being visible and personally known exceptions  to EENS which traditionally had no exceptions. So the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 says that ‘ for eternal salvation, it is not always required that he be incorporated into the Church actually as a member’. It is as if there were explicit and objective cases of the baptism of desire in 1949-Boston or Rome.2

Why is it not necessary to be a member when for centuries the dogma EENS has said that it was necessary ? Since the Letter assumes there are practical exceptions of being saved with the baptism of desire.But it was common sense for centuries that there were no objective cases of the catechumen being saved without the baptism of water and instead with only the desire.So what was invisible was projected as being visible.This was the False Premise. It gave birth to the New Theology which says outside the Church there is known salvation in the present times, so there are exceptions to  EENS etc.3

A pope who is in First Class Heresy ( Ad Tuendem Fidem ) cannot be a pope.

He is also an un-believer when he re-interprets Vatican Councl II irrationally by confusing hypothetical cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 , AG 11  ( seeds of the Word) etc, as being objective examples of salvation outside the Church, in 2021.So he created objective exceptions for the Athanasius Creed etc.So he did not qualify to be a cardinal or pope.He could not make a standard Profession of Faith or an Oath of Office of the Bishop since the False Premise skewers theology and doctrine.

He was not eligible.

Pope Francis and Pope Benedict are not Magisterial on Vatican Council II. The Holy Spirit cannot make an objective mistake and promote deception and also heresy and schism.With the Fake Premise they bring division and liberalism into the Church.

The error can be avoided today if Pope Francis uses the Rational Premise ( invisible people are invisible in 2021). Then there is no rupture with the past Magisterium.-Lionel Andrades

1

https://johnjburnslibrary.wordpress.com/2015/11/30/outside-bc-there-was-leonard-feeney-father-keleher-the-fired-four-and-the-boston-heresy-case/

2

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/10/pope-francis-and-cardinal-marx-can-no.html

3

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/10/with-vatican-council-ii-interpreted.html