Bishop Robert Barron is interpreting Vatican Council II with the False Premise and not the Rational Premise and is not talking about it. Every Catholic should reject an ecumenical Council interpreted with a false premise to create a false rupture with Tradition.

Bishop Robert Barron is interpreting Vatican Council II with the False Premise and not the Rational Premise and is not talking about it. Every Catholic should reject an ecumenical Council interpreted with a false premise to create a false rupture with Tradition. Catholics can accept Vatican Council II when it is interpreted with a Rational Premise and so then there is no break with the past Magisterium and traditional ecclesiocentrism, which Bishop Robert Barron does not want to accept and proclaim.-Lionel Andrades

SEPTEMBER 26, 2021

The theological paper Christianity and the World Religions of the International Theological Commission was approved by Pope Benedict and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj in 1997 during the pontificate of Pope John Paul II : it interprets Vatican Council II with the false premise to create a false rupture with Catholic Tradition

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/09/christianity-and-world-religions-of.html

WIKIPEDIA USES THE FALSE PREMISE

Wikipedia still continues to interpret Church documents with the false premise and there is no correction from the Vatican.Check the entries, Vatican Council II,Fr.Leonard Feeney, Feeneyism, extra ecclesiam nulla salus etc.The false premise is always there.

LINKS FROM THE RIGHT HAND COLUMN. CLICK TO ACCESS.

• Wikipedia (24)
• Wikipedia interprets Vatican Council II with Cushingism (2)
• Wikipedia Misleading (5)
• Wikipedia needs to correct their ideological report on Fr. Leonard Feeney. (1)
• Wikpedia (1)

Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Second Vatican Council, Dogmatic Constitution Lumen gentium, 14: "They could not be saved who, knowing that the Catholic Church was founded as necessary by God through Christ, would refuse either to enter it, or to remain in it."

Second Vatican Council, Dogmatic Constitution Lumen gentium, 16: ". . .Nor is God far distant from those who in shadows and images seek the unknown God, for it is He who gives to all men life and breath and all things, and as Saviour wills that all men be saved. Those also can attain to salvation who through no fault of their own do not know the Gospel of Christ or His Church, yet sincerely seek God and moved by grace strive by their deeds to do His will as it is known to them through the dictates of conscience. Nor does Divine Providence deny the helps necessary for salvation to those who, without blame on their part, have not yet arrived at an explicit knowledge of God and with His grace strive to live a good life. . .But often men, deceived by the Evil One, have become vain in their reasonings and have exchanged the truth of God for a lie, serving the creature rather than the Creator. Or some there are who, living and dying in this world without God, are exposed to final despair. . ."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extra_Ecclesiam_nulla_salus

NOTE : Lumen Gentium 14 ( baptism of desire) and Lumen Gentium 16(invincible ignorance ) are mentioned by Wikipedia with reference to Extra ecclesiam nulla salus.It is  as if they are practical exceptions.For them to be exceptions the false premise had to be used creating a New Theology which now says outside the Church there is known salvation. Outside the Church there is salvation.

_______________________