There are two interpretations of
Magisterial Documents , one with the False Premise which I call Cushingite and
the other with the Rational Premise I call Feeneyite.Cushingism is a break with
the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and extra
ecclesiam nulla salus ( with no exceptions).Feneeyism is in harmony with
Tradition.
So it is not enough to refer, for
example, to Vatican Council II, without specifying if you mean Vatican Council
II Cushingite or Feeneyite.
Here is a short list.
Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite or Cushingite).
Athanasius Creed ( Feeneyite or Cushingite).
Extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Feeneyite
or Cushingite ).
Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite or
Cushingite).
Catechism of the Council of Trent (
Feeneyite or Cushingite).
Catechism of the Baltimore ( Feeneyite
or Cushingite )
Catechism of Pope Pius X ( Feeneyite or
Cushingite).
Catechism of the Catholic Church (
Feeneyite or Cushingite ).
These are Primary Church Documents. We
can interpret them with the False Premise or the Rational Premise and the
conclusion would be irrational or rational.
There are also Secondary Church
Documents. They are only Cushingite.There are no Church Documents after Vatican
Council II, which I can think of , which are only Feeneyite.
Traditionis Custode is Cushingite.Pope
Francis used the False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II.
The Lutheran-Catholic Declaration on
Justification is Cushingite.
The Balamand Declaration is Cushingite
and so null and void.
In a Primary Document we can choose
between Feeneyism and Cushingism. In a Secondary Document we cannot choose.It
is Cushingite.
Vatican Council II itself is a Primary
Document since there are Feeneyite and Cushingite passages.
In Dijon, France the writings of Bishop
Roland Mitterand are Cushingite and so he was made a consultant to the
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF).
The Dominicans today, unlike St.Dominic,
are Cushingites and so they were appointed members of the Vatican’s International
Theological Commission.
Bishop Athanasius Schneider and
Dr.Taylor Marshall have been Cushingite but when they said that there are no
literal cases of the baptism of desire and there are no explicit cases of
Aquinas’ implicit baptism of desire, they were Feeneyite.They implied that
there were no objective exceptions for Feeneyite EENS. There were none
mentioned in Vatican Council II.
Fr. Georges de Laire, Vicar General, in
the Diocese of Manchester, New Hampshire, USA, is Cushingite and so he was
approved by the CDF to place a harsh Decree of Prohibitions upon the St. Benedict
Center(SBC).The SBC are Feeneyite on Vatican Council II and EENS.
If Judge Joseph DiClerico Jr., in New
Hampshire is Feeneyite on Vatican
Council II and EENS then he will note that Fr. Georges de Laire is unethical
and dishonest, even after being informed and so is Bishop Peter
Libasci, the Bishop of the Diocese of Manchester.
They are following the CDF which is also Cushingite on Vatican Council II and EENS, the Creeds and Catechisms.Cushingism is irrational.So they are irrational on Vatican Council II, EENS, the Creeds and Catechisms.
For a secular or religious judiciary , a False
Premise is a False Premise, a lie is a lie.-Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment