Judge Joseph Di Clerico
Jr., must note that the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) and Fr. Georges de Laire are slandering and
defaming the St. Benedict Center(SBC), since they do not use a Fake Premise to
interpret extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), Vatican Council II and other Magisterial
Documents.The CDF and the Diocese of Manchester impose a private and political interpretation of EENS and Vatican Council II, which
cannot be that of the Catholic Church and then they are making legal demands,
enumerated in a harsh Decree of Prohibitions.
Since the SBC will not
conform their chapel has been closed and the lay Catholics have to go for Mass
at another church, where the priest and religious community conform with the
official deception of the CDF and the bishop and Curia of the Diocese of
Manchester.
The CDF and Fr. Georges
de Laire violate the Principle of Non Contradiction when they want the SBC to say that unknown
cases of the baptism of desire in the present times (2021), mentioned in the
Cathechism of the Catholic Church (847-848) are objective and personally known
people saved outside the Church, without
Catholic faith and the baptism of water. So invisible people are projected as objective
exceptions to the strict interpretation of EENS, as held by the St. Benedict
Center, N.H.For the CDF and Fr.De Laire, Vatican Council II (LG 16) is a
break with the 16th century interpretation of EENS according to the
Magisterium of that time.
But it is common sense
that there are no objective cases of non Catholics saved in invincible
ignorance in New Hampshire in 1965-2021.
The Slaves of the
Immaculate Heart of Mary in New Hampshire accept Vatican Council II and EENS but unlike the plaintiff Fr. George de Laire, interprets them with the Rational Premise ( invisible cases are invisible in 2021, LG 16 does not refer to a literal and known person but a hypothetical case).
Yet the SBC are called 'ultra traditionalists' by a leftist media to whom Fr. Georges de Laire grants interviews, without correcting their errors.
All the religious communities in New Hampshire are being forced to accept the unethical interpretation of Vatican Council II and EENS or face severe consequences. The SBC is refusing to accept this official dishonesty and so they are targeted.
The Vatican Nuncio could confirm that Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and his Secretaries, Archbishops Giacomo Morandi and Augustine di Noia, use a Fake Premise ( invisible people are visible in 2021 who are allegedly saved outside the Catholic Church without the baptism of water and Catholic Faith but with the baptism of desire or invincible ignorance).This irrationality is accepted by Bishop Peter Libasci and his Curia and there is no denial from any of them over the last few years.They are not responding in writing for requests for information.
Fr. Georges de Laire at his million dollar home, which he purchased with his own money received from an inheritance, granted an interview to a correspondent (Union Leader, New Hampshire), and did not tell him, that if they both did not use the False Premise, they would be affirming the same doctrine as the St. Benedict Center.It is only the sneaky Fake Premise which allows them to be politically correct and change Catholic teaching.So now they do not have to affirm the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, the Athanasius Creed and EENS which are all made obsolete with the Irrational Premise approved by the CDF.
The National Catholic Reporter (Christopher White) in a report critical of Michael Voris and Church Militant TV, has criticized the SBC as if the Decree of Prohibitions has been placed upon them since they do not affirm the Church teachings, when it is the CDF which uses a Fake Premise to violate the Principle of Non Contradiction and rejects the traditiional de fide teachings.It then imposes a harsh Decree upon the religious community Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, Richmond, NH.
The judge could ask the CDF to clarify if they have changed the teachings of the Catholic Church and this is hidden and unknown to the people.The means was unethical and it was clear subterfuge?
The SBC needs to be compensated since they are
following the teachings of the Catholic Church,
with no public deception.They suffer because of
the CDF official deception which can be confirmed on the website of the Diocese of Manchester, the Placuit Deo Press Conference and in two theological papers of the International Theological Commission, Vatican.-Lionel Andrades
NOVEMBER 11, 2021
If Judge Joseph DiClerico Jr., in New Hampshire is Feeneyite on Vatican Council II and EENS then he will note that Fr. Georges de Laire is unethical and dishonest, even after being informed and so is Bishop Peter Libasci, the Bishop of the Diocese of Manchester.
There are two interpretations of Magisterial Documents , one with the False Premise which I call Cushingite and the other with the Rational Premise I call Feeneyite.Cushingism is a break with the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( with no exceptions).Feneeyism is in harmony with Tradition.
So it is not enough to refer, for example, to Vatican Council II, without specifying if you mean Vatican Council II Cushingite or Feeneyite.
Here is a short list.
Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite or Cushingite).
Athanasius Creed ( Feeneyite or Cushingite).
Extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Feeneyite or Cushingite ).
Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite or Cushingite).
Catechism of the Council of Trent ( Feeneyite or Cushingite).
Catechism of the Baltimore ( Feeneyite or Cushingite )
Catechism of Pope Pius X ( Feeneyite or Cushingite).
Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Feeneyite or Cushingite ).
These are Primary Church Documents. We can interpret them with the False Premise or the Rational Premise and the conclusion would be irrational or rational.
There are also Secondary Church Documents. They are only Cushingite.There are no Church Documents after Vatican Council II, which I can think of , which are only Feeneyite.
Traditionis Custode is Cushingite.Pope Francis used the False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II.
The Lutheran-Catholic Declaration on Justification is Cushingite.
The Balamand Declaration is Cushingite and so null and void.
In a Primary Document we can choose between Feeneyism and Cushingism. In a Secondary Document we cannot choose.It is Cushingite.
Vatican Council II itself is a Primary Document since there are Feeneyite and Cushingite passages.
In Dijon, France the writings of Bishop Roland Mitterand are Cushingite and so he was made a consultant to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF).
The Dominicans today, unlike St.Dominic, are Cushingites and so they were appointed members of the Vatican’s International Theological Commission.
Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Dr.Taylor Marshall have been Cushingite but when they said that there are no literal cases of the baptism of desire and there are no explicit cases of Aquinas’ implicit baptism of desire, they were Feeneyite.They implied that there were no objective exceptions for Feeneyite EENS. There were none mentioned in Vatican Council II.
Fr. Georges de Laire, Vicar General, in the Diocese of Manchester, New Hampshire, USA, is Cushingite and so he was approved by the CDF to place a harsh Decree of Prohibitions upon the St. Benedict Center(SBC).The SBC are Feeneyite on Vatican Council II and EENS.
If Judge Joseph DiClerico Jr., in New Hampshire is Feeneyite on Vatican Council II and EENS then he will note that Fr. Georges de Laire is unethical and dishonest, even after being informed and so is Bishop Peter Libasci, the Bishop of the Diocese of Manchester.
They are following the CDF which is also Cushingite on Vatican Council II and EENS, the Creeds and Catechisms.Cushingism is irrational.So they are irrational on Vatican Council II, EENS, the Creeds and Catechisms.
For a secular or religious judiciary , a False Premise is a False Premise, a lie is a lie.-Lionel Andrades
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/11/if-judge-joseph-diclerico-jr-in-new.html
NOVEMBER 11, 2021
Judge Joseph A. Diclerico Jr., in New Hampshire must ask Fr. Georges de Laire, the CDF and the liberal media to clarify their theological and doctrinal position : SBC being slandered
Judge Joseph A. Diclerico Jr., in New Hampshire could note that the St.Benedict Center, Richmond, New Hampshire ( mentioned by Fr. Georges de Laire in the legal suit against Michael Voris) is being defamed only because they refuse to interpret Vatican Council II and EENS with a False Premise.
Fr. Georges de Laire and the Curia in the Diocese of Manchester,USA, use the False Premise to interpret all Magiserterial Documents and there is no denial from any of them. The Curia does not deny using the unethical False Premise.
Even the National Catholic Reporter and New Hampshire Union Leader use the False Premise to interpret Magisterial Documents.Then they calumninate the St. Benedict Center directly or innuendo for not choosing the same deception and the lie.
The diocese of Manchester cannot explain their theological and doctrinal position in writing( as I have done on this blog Eucharist and Mission ).They would say that they are following the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF).But the CDF also uses the same False Premise , to interpret Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).
The CDF has no right to violate the Principle of Non Contradiction .It must not suggest that people saved with the baptism of desire etc are in Heaven and also visible on earth for them to be exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus .
They cannot be in two places at the same time.
This is fantasy and irrational.This nonsense cannot be a reason to impose a harsh Decree of Prohibitions on the religious at the St.Benedict Center.
The Slaves, an ultra-traditionalist offshoot of a Massachusetts group founded by the late Rev. Leonard Feeney, were ordered to stop calling themselves Catholic in January 2019 under the terms of a letter from the diocese. The group was given an extensive list of prohibitions, including a restriction against raising money for a Catholic entity. 1
It is false to call them ultra traditionalist when they affirm Vatican Council II and EENS but interpret them rationally unlike Damien Fisher(New Hamphire Union Leader) and Christopher White and Heidi Schlumpf at the National Catholic Reporter, who affirm Vatican Council II and EENS irrationally to create a break with Feeneyite EENS.
Rev. Georges de Laire, the episcopal vicar for canonical affairs for the Diocese of Manchester, said the fundraising for the school may fall just short of violating the 2019 restrictions. While the group cannot claim it is operating a Catholic school, it instead claims its school offers an education in the “Catholic tradition.”
“They know exactly what they are doing,” de Laire said. “It is not the first time the group has manipulated language in order to project official recognition by the Catholic Church.”
According to a statement on the diocesan website, the group is not supposed to imply in any way an affiliation with the church. 2
Fr.Georges de Laire refuses to say in public what really is his theological position, if he has any on this issue. The CDF is irrational and so non traditional on this issue.
The CDF Archbishops use the same False Premise as Fr. Georges de Laire to avoid affirming Feeneyite EENS.This is unethical and dishonest. For political reasons they change the theology and doctrines of the Catholic Church, with the use of a Fake Premise.Then those who do not support this deception are hit with sanctions.
How can Fr. Georges de Laire remain a Judicial Vicar when he interprets Magisterial documents deceptively and does not deny it?
Bishop Peter Libasci, Fr. Georges de Laire, the National Catholic Reporter and the New Hampshire Union Leader reporters could clarify that they do not interpret Vatican Council II with the Fake Premise. They are not unethical and dishonest.
1.If they do use the False Premise they are unethical and dishonest.
2.If they do not use the False Premise they hold the same theological and doctrinal position as the St.Benedict Center. They would be rejecting the New Theology and going back to the old theology. They would be affirming extra ecclesiam nulla salus with the traditional exclusivist interpretation.The irrational and deceptive interpretation of the CDF would be avoided.
The liberal media and Fr. Georges de Laire and the CDF must let us know where they stand on these issues.-Lionel Andrades
1
https://www.unionleader.com/news/religion/religious-community-raises-money-despite-restrictions/article_b7b4f383-c0db-5c0f-be40-4a7e2ccafa3c.html
2
ibid
__________________________
NOVEMBER 6, 2021
For Judge Joseph A. Diclerico Jr. there would be no literal cases of the BOD, BOB and I.I in New Hampshire in 2021 : but for Fr. Georges de Laire there are
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/11/judge-joseph-diclerico-jr-in-new.html
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment