Now it is unethical for a journalist to write that Vatican Council II is a rupture with Tradition. It is unethical since LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are not exceptions to 16th century and Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).These are hypothetical cases and so cannot be exceptions to exclusive salvation in the Church. So for a writer to know this, and then still project Vatican Council II as a discontinuity with the past eccclesiology, an ecumenism of return and the Syllabus of Errors, would be dishonest.
Pope Benedict needs to apologize for projecting LG 16, GS 22 etc as being practical exceptions to the past ecclesiology of the Church.He has made this error in his articles and books and two theological papers of the International Theological Commission, Vatican, which he approved as the cardinal-prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.
Ignatius Press must stop accepting manuscripts from Pope Benedict, in which he projects Vatican Council II as a rupture with the old ecclesiocentric ecclesiology of the Church, an ecumenism of return and Feeneyite EENS which are the theological basis for a proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King in all politics and laws,the priority being to save sould from going to Hell-and the non separation of Church and State.
He followed the Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO) which made an objective mistake when it assumed unknown cases of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance were known exceptions to Feeneyite EENS. Invisible people were projected as visible examples of salvation outside the Church. The mistake was not corrected by Pope Pius XII, Pope John XXIII, Pope Paul VI and the popes who followed.
Now the German Press Council, can check journalists who unethically project Vatican Council II as a rupture with the ecclesiology of the Catholic saints and bishops of Freising, like St.Corbinian (24-730) who founded the Benedictine abbey in Freising.
It would be dishonest for Pope Benedict to continue to write books for Ignatius Press, projecting Vatican Council II falsely i.e indicating that there is known salvation outside the Church. In real life, we cannot see or meet someone saved outside the Catholic Church, with faith and the baptism of water.This can only be known to God.
Pope Benedict needs to clarify that he made an objective mistake. He violated the Principle of Non Contradiction of Aristotle, when in March 2016 ( Avvenire) he said that EENS today was no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century, since there was a development with Vatican Council II. He meant Vatican Council II interpreted unethically.
Similarly Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj was dishonest at the Placuet Deo Press Conference,when along with Archbishop Giacomo Morandi, he projected Lumen Gentium 8 as an exception to the traditional teaching on the Church having an exclusiveness and superiority in salvation. He made this remark in response to a question from an Associated Press lady reporter.
Church Militant TV, the National Catholic Register and news agencies reported the Placquet Deo Conference without pointing out the deception.
It would be dishonest for the news agencies or the Vatican media to continue to project Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition ( Athanasius Creed, Catechism of Pope Pius X etc), it would also be the same for Church Militant TV,Correspondenza Romano, Gloria TV and the traditionalist websites and blogs,to do the same.
Traditionalists, Cushingite Lefbvrists, who were present at the Acies Ordinata assembly in Munich and Cardinal Reinhardt Marx, Archbishop of Munich and Freising, for example,both need to confirm that all the books on Vatican Council II at the Catholic University of Eichstadt-Ingolstadt University, Bavaria, in the library, are obsolete and carry the common error. Upon this irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II there is to be a Synodal Path of the German bishops.
New books need to be written on the Council.The present books confuse hypothetical cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc as being non hypothetical and then project them as being known examples of salvation outside the Church-Lionel Andrades
January 28, 2020
The publishers of Pope Benedict's books in German must note that he used a false premise and inference to interpret Vatican Council II as a break with Tradition and this is not only bad philosophy and bad theology it is unethical and dishonest.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/the-publishers-of-pope-benedicts-books.html
January 27, 2020
The former Archbishop of Munich's books published by Ignatius Press have an in- principle error.The German Joseph Ratzinger's books were written with an irrational premise to create an artificial rupture with Tradition on Vatican Council II, the Catechism of the Catholic Church, the Nicene Creed and other magisterial documents.There should be an apology from Pope Benedict and Ignatius Press.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/the-former-archbishop-of-munichs-books.html
January 28, 2020
Deutsche Presserat needs to inform newspapers and publishers that there is a rational and honest interpretation of Vatican Council II it is ethical.It does not create an artificial and calculated rupture with Catholic Tradition,pleasing to one lobby
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/deutsche-presserat-needs-to-inform.html
JANUARY 25, 2020
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment