The bishops and priests of the SSPX, Ecclesia Dei and Bishop Athanasius Schneider hear Confessions of Catholics who are sin but with the False Premise in the interpretation of Vatican Council II they support mortal sins of faith

 

The bishops and priests of the SSPX, Ecclesia Dei and Bishop Athanasius Schneider hear Confessions of Catholics who are sin but with the False Premise in the interpretation of Vatican Council II there is a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, there is a break with an ecumenism of return of the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the Nicene and Apostles Creed is changed. They have to re-interpret the Catechisms which mention the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance.This is a break with the past Magisterium. This is heresy and schism which are mortal sins of faith. They have an option. They can interpret the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance with the rational premise and then re-interpret Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus rationally and historically.

Bishop Athanasius Schneider has said that there are no literal cases of the baptism of desire ( LG 14). This is interpreting Vatican Council II ( LG 14) rationally.However he still has to interpret LG 8, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc rationally and then notice that the Council no where contradicts the past ecclesiocentrism of the Church. He then has to affirm this ecclesiocentrism which is politically not correct with the Left and the Vatican.He would be saying that outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation and like the Athanasius Creed he would have to say that all need to be members of the Catholic Church to avoid Hell.It would also be saying that non Christians are oriented into the Catholic Church to avoid Hell (CDF, Notification, Fr.Jacques Dupuis sj, 2001 during the pontificate of Pope John Paul II etc, Dominus Iesus 20 etc) -Lionel Andrades