Dr.Peter Kwasniewski
interprets Vatican Council II like the liberals. He chooses to use the False
Premise like Archbishop Arthur Roche.
Instead he should be
saying that only those who accept and interpret Vatican Council II with the
Rational Premise are really qualified, to attend/offer Holy Mass in Latin or
the vernacular.
Kwasniewski and Roche’s
irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II is unethical. They both support
a liberalism based upon a False Premise and so are politically correct with the
Jewish Left (ADL etc).
How can they both speak
about the Latin Mass without qualifying if they refer to Vatican Council II
rational or irrational?
Why must Catholics
support the liberalism of those who interpret Vatican Council II with the
irrational and not rational premise?
Why must one go for Holy
Mass, in any liturgy or any rite, and accept a non-traditional conclusion in the
interpretation of Vatican Council II?
So Kwasniewski and Dr. Joseph
Shaw believe that they have a right to the Latin Mass since they are liberals
like Archbishop Arthur Roche and interpret Magisterial Documents also with the same False Premise?
They have forgotten the
laity at Dijon, France, who have to attend the ‘old Mass’ with ‘the new
theology’ and the ‘new ecclesiology’, of the diocesan priests and Bishop Roland
Minnerath.
No one is asking Bishop
Minnerath to offer Holy Mass in French, as he does, while only interpret ting
Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise.-Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment