Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with the same False Premise as the sedevacantists CMRI and MHFM.They confuse what is invisible (LG 16 for example) as being visible(Unknown cases of LG 16 etc are known and physically visible) in 1965-2022.

 

Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with the same False Premise as the sedevacantists CMRI and MHFM.They confuse what is invisible (LG 16 for example) as being visible(unknown cases of LG 16 etc are known and physically visible) in 1965-2022.Pope Francis accepts the non traditional conclusion and the CMRI and MHFM reject it.

Without this mistake the whole Church goes back to Tradition automatically and immediately.All who attend the Novus Ordo Mass return to the exclusivist ecclesiology of the Traditional Latin Mass of the 16^th century.

The liberalism that we see today come from the False Premise ( LG 16 is an example of salvation outside the Church in 2022) and not the Novus Ordo Mass.

The Traditional Latin Mass of the 16^th century was traditional in its theology and doctrine since they did not use the False Premise at that time. The False Premise came officially into the Church with the political Letter of the Holy Office 1949. It projected unknown cases of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance as being known examples of salvation outside the Church and so made the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus obsolete. Fr. Kark Rahner sj placed the Letter of the Holy Office 1949, with the objective error, in the Denzinger and it was referenced in Vatican Council II.Since then there are two interpretations of Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus, with the False Premise and with the Rational Premise. I use the Rational Premise. The others choose the false one.It is official heresy and schism. -Lionel Andrades