There are two interpretations
of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational. The
conclusion of the rational interpretation is traditional and that of the
irrational non-traditional, heretical and schismatic. Pope Francis chooses the
irrational interpretation and then justifies Amoris Laetitia and giving the
Eucharist to the divorced and re-married, like Silvio Berlusconi. So with the
theology and ecclesiology changed and the irrational interpretation of
Vatican Council II being cited as the cause of the change, it is asked by the
liberals and Masons, why cannot moral theology also be changed ?
But the interpretation
of Vatican Council II with the False Premise is unethical, it is immoral too.
Yet this is the false interpretation of President Sergio Mattarella who the
other day took an Oath of Office as the President of Italy, still suggesting
that he is a Catholic.
Whether he is a Catholic
or not a Catholic, he is still using a False Premise to interpret Vatican
Council II and there is no denial from his office.
Based on Vatican Council
II (Irrational) Matteralla and the liberals and Masons support LGBT mortal sins
and pro abortion policies.
With the Fake Premise he
rejects Magisterial Documents including the Athanasius Creed and this
disqualifies him from claiming he is a Catholic. It also disqualifies Pope
Francis from claiming he is the pope and a Catholic. They both need to correct
the error and end the scandal.
Once they choose the
Rational Premise, they return to the old theology and there are no practical
exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II for the past ecclesiocentrism of the
Church.LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc cannot be cited as practical
exceptions any more for the Syllabus of Errors, by Pope Francis and President
Sergio Mattarella.
To be a Catholic they need to accept Magisterial
Documents and interpret them rationally.-Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment