Homily of the Archbishop of Milan for Missionary Martyrs

The Archbishop of Milan mentions the ambassador Luca (Time 9:14 on the video) who was killed in an African country 'as a martyr'. This is stretching it.

Since Luca was not killed for proclaiming the Catholic faith. In fact his life was conspicuous for a lack of it.

He was married to a non Christian and his marriage was not a Sacrament yet there was a funeral Mass held for him at the Basilica of St. Mary of the Angels, with the Prime Minister Mario Draghi present.

This was a high profile Mass which was political. Luka’s non Christian wife was present and she said that Luka had betrayed everyone.It seemed from the media reports and Cardinal Donatis' homily, that Luca had a family here.

It all indicated that he was living in mortal sin.

Adultery and fornication are mortal sins and lead a person to Hell.

A Mass was held for him approved by the Leftist state, who are today going ahead with the DDL-Zan law which will punish those who oppose or criticize homosexuality as taught by the Catholic Church and other religions.The law is before the Italian Senate.

Luka should today be in Hell if he is not made an exception by the liberals and Masons.

The Archbishop also interprets Vatican Council II with the False Premise otherwise he would have to affirm the Syllabus of Errors and state that those Catholics who leave the Catholic faith are in mortal sin and are oriented to Hell.

For me LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to hypothetical cases only. The Archdiocese of Milan cannot say the same. So for me Vatican Council II does not mention any practical exceptions for the Syllabus of Errors and the Athanasius Creed. The ecclesiology of the Catholic Church today for me is the same as St. Ambrose of Milan. The Archdiocese of Milan cannot say the same. Since it would then mean that they support the past ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church. So then those who leave the Catholic Church would be outside the Church and on the way to Hell, for the Archdiocese of Milan.

It would also mean that with Vatican Council II interpreted with the Rational Premise there is no change in the Church's moral theology for the archdiocese. Catholics living with non Catholics in concubinage are in mortal sins of morals.They cannot excuse themselves by saying that Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally has changed the old theology and ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.We can now interpret Vatican Council II rationally. We have a choice. Why should we choose the irrational version approved by Mario Draghi and George Soros? -Lionel Andrades