John Allen Jr and George Weigel have written books on Pope Benedict and neither of them have mentioned the Fake Premise, False Inference and Non Traditional Conclusion (hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition) in the liberal theology of the CDF Prefect

 

MARCH 29, 2022

John Allen Jr and George Weigel have written books on Pope Benedict and neither of them have mentioned the Fake Premise, False Inference and Non Traditional Conclusion (hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition) in the liberal theology of the CDF Prefect

 

John Allen Jr and George Weigel have written books on Pope Benedict and neither of them have mentioned the Fake Premise, False Inference and Non Traditional Conclusion (hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition) in the liberal theology of the former Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican.

Without the False Premise there would be no liberalism, which they both support.

John Allen has written a report critical of the Latin Mass but without the Fake Premise, in the interpretation of Vatican Council II he would have to return to the old theology of the Latin Mass. Presently his interpretation of the Council, like that of Pope Francis, is dishonest and obsolete.

For me LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, Gs 22 etc refer to physically invisible people in 1965-2022.For them LG 8 etc refer to physically visible cases. It is only with this dishonesty that they can pretend that Vatican Council II contradicts the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX etc.

-Lionel Andrades

WE HAVE TWO INTERPRETATIONS OF 

VATICAN COUNCIL II : YOURS AND MINE

Lionel Andrades

Catholic lay man in Rome. Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.How can the Holy Spirit make an objective mistake ? So it is human error and not the Magisterium.

 Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral.

It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms. There can be two interpretations.Catholics must choose the rational option.

Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, nontraditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional?

Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission)

E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com

Twitter : @LionelAndrades1

___________________