There is a lot of truth in this video
made by Brother Peter Dimond of the Most Holy Family Monastery, New York. I
agree with many things which they say here but I also disagree with many
things. For example, Peter and Michael Dimond interpret Vatican Council II,
with the False Premise. It is the same with ‘the Vatican Council II sect’.
I have mentioned this before but I get
no response. I am also not allowed to comment on their website and there is no
dialogue between us.Though, I appreciate their work on EENS and Catholic
Tradition.
I don’t see the need to go into
sedevacantism like them, since Vatican Council II is not a break with Catholic
ecclesiocentism for me,when I use the Rational Premise to interpret the
Council.
I affirm the strict interpretation of
the dogma EENS like them. I also reject the baptism of desire, baptism of blood
and invincible ignorance as being
practical exceptions for EENS, just like them.
But our understanding of BOD, BOB and
I.I seems different.Since I do accept
BOD, BOB and I.I but only as being hypothetical cases. So I do not have to
reject them. It is not BOD, BOB and I.I or EENS. I do not have to make the
choice since BOD, BOB and I.I are not explicit for me.
For me they are always hypothetical and invisible
cases in 2022. I would like to assume it is the same with the MHFM, but I do
not know. Since there is a lot of confusion and there is no communication
between us.
If BOD, BOB and I.I were hypothetical
for them then LG 8, LG 14 (BOD), LG 16 (I.I), UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 would not be
practical exceptions for their concept of EENS. So the Council would not be a
rupture with Tradition.
Yet for Pope Francis and Brother Peter
Dimond, Vatican Council II is a break
with EENS, the Syllabus of Errors and the Athanasius Creed. So it means they
are all interpreting LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as being visible and objective cases
in 2022. Only since they are physically visible in personal cases on earth this
year, that they can be practical exceptions for EENS and the past exclusivist
ecclesiology of , for example, the missionaries in the 16th century.Invisible
people cannot be objective exceptions for EENS etc.
There is no comment from the MHFM.
-Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment