The Decree of Precepts and Prohibitions issued by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF), Vatican against Brother Andre Marie MICM and the St. Benedict Center, Richmond, New Hampshire, USA was false.Was it also illegal ?

 

The Decree of Precepts and Prohibitions  issued by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF), Vatican against Brother Andre Marie MICM and the St. Benedict Center, Richmond, New Hampshire, USA was false.Was it also illegal ? Since a False and not Rational Premise was used to change Church theology and doctrine.Then a rupture with Catholic Tradition,was created,  in particular EENS. It was suggested that this was the official teaching of the Church when it only was the teaching of the Church when a False Premise was used.The liberalism comes only with the False Premise.

With the Rational Premise there is no development of doctrine.

The Decree was a rupture with the past Magisterium on EENS etc and so it could not be Magisterial. 

Even by secular standards the Decree was unethical.The CDF chose the False Premise and not the Rational Premise and tried to impose it upon Brother Andre Marie micm, and the religious community in New Hampshire, USA, with legal threats mentioned in the Decree. This is being dishonest in public. It was not Catholic but was it also not legal ? -Lionel Andrades