Conservatives are telling Pope Francis that that they accept Vatican Council II, when they mean Vatican Council II irrational and not Vatican Council II, rational. So with Vatican Council II irrational there is a break with the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors. and the rest of Tradition

 

Conservatives are telling Pope Francis that that they accept Vatican Council II, when they mean Vatican Council II irrational and not Vatican Council II, rational. So with Vatican Council II irrational there is a break with the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors. With Vatican Council II rational, they would have to affirm the Creeds and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

So today from the pope to the parish the Catholic Faith is being rejected with Vatican Council II, irrational.

Even at the Latin Mass, Chris Ferrara, Roberto dei Mattei, Michael Matt, John Henry Weston, Maike Hickson and Peter Kwasniewski are affirming Vatican Council II, irrational, not the rational version, which is not a break with Tradition.

Some may say that they do not accept Vatican Council II, irrational, but, at the same time, they are not affirming Vatican Council II, rational in public.

The SSPX would say that they reject the

Council and also say that they accept 99% of

the Council. But the bottom line is that they

are interpreting the Council with the False

Premise and not the Rational Premise. It is

the same with the liberals.  -Lionel Andrades