Conclusion to
Section C
We have seen in
this last section C how the Council proposes to the Church a system tantamount
to Gnosis. We cannot but conclude that this was occasioned by the serpent
proposing the same system of Gnosis to the Council. Just as he proposed Gnosis
to the whole of humanity in the form of Adam and Eve, then, so he proposed it
again to the whole of humanity in the form of the representatives of the very
heart of humanity which is the Church: and in both cases the proposal was
accepted.
The result is gnosis when Don Pietro Leone and Rorate
Caeili (F.G) continue to use a False Premise, Inference and Conclusion to
interpret Vatican Council II instead of the rational option, which I choose.
Like me, they can easily choose to interpret LG
8,14,15,16, UR3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as being hypothetical in 2022. This is
something obvious.
The result will be traditional. There will be nothing
in Vatican Council II to contradict the strict interpretation of extra
ecclesiam nulla salous.Invisible cases of LG 8 etc cannot be objective examples
of salvation outside the Church and practical exceptions for EENS with no
exceptions.
So the Council is no more a break with the past
ecclesiocentrism.
But Rorate Caeili, Roberto dei Mattei,Joseph Shaw and
others who are liberal these days, do not want to affirm 16th century
EENS with no exceptions.
So they continue to interpret Vatican Council II with
the Irrational Premise and like the liberals say that the Council contradicts Tradition.
So the fault does not lie with the Council. I
interpret LG 8 etc rationally. The Council emerges orthodox on ecclesiology, mission, salvation,
marriage, ecumenism of return, non separation of Church and State and the proclamation
of the Social Reign of Christ the King in all politics based upon Feeneyite
EENS and the necessity for all to be Catholic to avoid the fires of Hell. In
Heaven there being only Catholics. -Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment