It is not the work of the devil when Vatican Council II is interpreted rationally and the Council is in harmony with Tradition.
The Council is traditional and dogmatic. It supports the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
This is there before our very eyes. All we have to do is 1) interpret
the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as
having no physically visible exceptions and then 2) interpret Vatican Council
II as containing no physically visible exceptions for extra ecclesiam nulla
salus.
So Don Leone and Rorate Caeili were wrong when some time back
they projected UR 3 in Vatican Council II, as being an exception for Feeneyite
EENS.Invisible people cannot be visible
exceptions.A practical exception for EENS has to exist in our reality.
But It is not the work of the devil when Vatican Council II is interpreted rationally and the Council is in harmony with Tradition.
The Council is traditional and dogmatic. It supports the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
This is there before our very eyes. All we have to do is 1) interpret
the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as
having no physically visible exceptions and then 2) interpret Vatican Council
II as containing no physically visible exceptions for extra ecclesiam nulla
salus.
So Don Leone and Rorate Caeili were wrong when some time back
they projected UR 3 in Vatican Council II, as being an exception for Feeneyite
EENS.Invisible people cannot be visible
exceptions.A practical exception for EENS has to exist in our reality.
But this is Rorate Caeili's political position on Vatican Council II like that of the Left and the two popes.This is modernism. For me there are no exceptions in Vatican Council II for the dogma EENS.-Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment