The seminaries of the Society of St. Pius X and the sedevantists CMRI and MHT must put away the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston relative to Fr. Leonard Feeney.

 

The seminaries of the Society of St. Pius X and the sedevantists CMRI and MHT  must put away the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston relative to Fr. Leonard Feeney. They will then also be also to interpret LG 8, LG 14, and LG 16 etc in Vatican Council II as referring to hypothetical and invisible cases only. So the Council will no more be a break with Tradition. Vatican Council II will be in harmony with Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

It is with the 1949 LOHO that liberalism has come into the Church. There is a developnent of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, a rejection of the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors and a re-interpretation, irrationally, of the Nicene and Apostles Creed. 

The first part of the LOHO is traditional and supports EENS but the second part contradicts the first part with the irrational interpretation of the baptism of desire (BOD) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I.

For Fr. Leonard Feeney there were no visible cases of the baptism of desire (BOD) and so BOD could not be an exception for EENS. But for Pope Pius XII, Cardinal Richard Cushing, the Archbishop of Boston and the Jesuit community in the USA, BOD and I.I were physically visible examples of salvation outside the Church. In this irrational way they were projected as exceptions for the strict interpretation of EENS. -Lionel Andrades

 JANUARY 20, 2023

Priests-professors who do not accept the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston will not be allowed to teach theology or philosophy at the pontifical universities

 Priests-professors who do not accept the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston will not be allowed to teach theology or philosophy at the pontifical universities in Rome and those institutions approved by the Vatican. The 1949 LOHO is obligatory. Since it brought in a New Theology. It rejected the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. This was done by wrongly assuming invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are physically visible examples of salvation outside the Church in the present times.-Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/01/seminarians-can-choose-to-interpret.html