The norm for salvation is Catholic faith and the baptism of water (AG 7, LG 14) and we do not know of any objective cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church. This is the teaching of the Catholic Church today. This was not the teaching of Mons. Joseph Clifford Fenton, Fr. John Hardon, Fr. William Most and Ludwig Ott who interpreted Magisterial Documents with the False Premise.

 

MAY 12, 2022

The norm for salvation is Catholic faith and the baptism of water (AG 7, LG 14) and we do not know of any objective cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church. This is the teaching of the Catholic Church today. This was not the teaching of Mons. Joseph Clifford Fenton, Fr. John Hardon, Fr. William Most and Ludwig Ott who interpreted Magisterial Documents with the False Premise.

 

When I meet a non Catholic I know he is oriented to Hell since the Catholic Church teaches this in Vatican Council II (Rational). The norm for salvation is Catholic faith and the baptism of water (AG 7, LG 14) and we do not know of any objective cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church. LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to only hypothetical cases, invisible people in 2022. So there are no practical exceptions, mentioned in Vatican Council II, for the dogma EENS, the Syllabus of Errors, the Athanasius Creed and the rest of Tradition.

This is the Magisterial teaching of the Catholic Church in harmony with the past Magisterium which was inspired by the Holy Spirit. This is continuity with the de fide teachings of the past in harmony with Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents interpreted with the Rational Premise.

This was not the teaching of Mons. Joseph Clifford Fenton, Fr. John Hardon, Fr. William Most and Ludwig Ott who interpreted Magisterial Documents with the False Premise.

This is not the teaching of the present popes, cardinals and bishops who use the same False Premise and then project Vatican Council II as a rupture with EENS and the Syllabus of Errors. The blame the Council and not their False Premise, of which they are unaware.

There are not literal cases of the baptism of desire said Bishop Athanasius Schneider, while using the Rational Premise. There are no explicit cases of St. Thomas Aquinas’ implicit baptism of desire, said Dr. Taylor Marshall, while also using the Rational Premise.

The baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are zero cases in our reality said the apologist John Martignoni, while also choosing the Rational Premise.Many priests in Rome have said that the baptism of desire was not an exception for Feeneyite EENS.

So we are back to the traditional exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church, with Mission based upon exclusive salvation. There is no New Ecumenism when Unitatis Redintigratio, the Decree on Ecumenism,in Vatican Council II, is interpreted with the Rational Premise.

So we proclaim the Social Reign of Christ the

King in all politics, since there are no exceptions for the traditional teaching of the Catholic Church on salvation, which is supported by Vatican Council II interpreted rationally.-Lionel Andrades