Will the Franciscans of the Immaculate and the SSPX be given permission by the Dicastery to offer Holy Mass in Latin ?

 

Those communities/ priests who interpret  Vatican Council II rationally i.e. LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc  refer to only hypothetical cases, must not apply to the Dicastery for Divine Worship, Vatican, asking permission to offer the Latin Mass. It will not be granted.

Bishop Dominique Rey and Don Pietro Leone will be granted permission since they will interpret Vatican Council II irrationally like the liberals i.e. LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to known non Catholics in 2023,  saved outside the Catholic Church, without faith and the baptism of water.

It is the same for being incardinated in Rome. If a priest affirms the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and also Vatican Council II interpreted rationally i.e. LG 8, 14, 16 , UR 3 etc, are only hypothetical cases, then he will not be granted permission by the Rome Vicariate, to offer Holy Mass in Rome,

The issue is extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) which is not contradicted by invisible cases of LG 8, 14, 16 etc.Now the problem has been extended to Vatican Council II. The Council can be interpreted in harmony or as a rupture with EENS.

So think of many of the priests who will ask Cardinal Arthur Roche and his Dicastery, permission to offer the Latin Mass and this will be granted to them since they will interpret the Creeds irrationally. Thousands of priests are already doing this at Mass in the vernacular.This is even though they can interpret the Council rationally at Mass in French for example.This was the situation in Dijon, France when Bishop Minnerath asked the FSSP to leave. No one asked the bishop and the diocesan priests in Dijon to interpret the Council rationally at the Novus Ordo Mass. This was the ethical thing to do.

Cardinal Raymond Burke offers the Latin Mass with Vatican Council II and the Creeds interpreted irrationally and Cardinal Walter Kasper does the same in German.

If Bishop Georg Batzing interpreted Vatican Council II and EENS rationally it would mean the has resigned from the German Synodal Way. There would be no development of doctrine and dogma. Since the theology would not be there any more for the change.It is only with the False Premise ( invisible cases of LG 8, 14 and 16 etc are physically visible in 2023), there can be a New Theology. It says outside the Catholic Church there is known salvation in the present times and so the dogma EENS, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX are obsolete.

The Latin Mass Societies and the Federation International Una Voce (FIUV) officially interpret Vatican Council II irrationally like the English bishops. They are liberals. So they will be granted permission by the Dicastery.

The Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate will have to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and accept the non-traditional conclusion. They may not be given permission by the Dicastery to offer Mass in Latin. The community of Fr. Stefano Manelli fi, may not even be given permission by the local bishops to offer Mass in the vernacular.

Like the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate, the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) priests do not accept Vatican Council II (irrational).Neither do they announce that they accept Vatican Council II (rational), not that it will be helpful. So will they be given permission to offer Mass in Latin?- Lionel Andrades