Faculty of
Theology, University of Munich is legally dishonest
At the
Faculty of Theology at the University of Munich, Germany, the professors, Catholic and Protestant, are
all interpreting Vatican Council II with a Fake Premise and Inference and so
their conclusion is nontraditional, heretical and schismatic. They are
unethical. So this is a legal issue in Germany. Students must be informed that the
university offers classes with a Fake Premise to interpret Vatican Council II
and other Magisterial Documents and it is obligatory for all enrolled students
to do the same. Also only those students will be given an academic degree or
allowed to complete the final matriculation exam, who interpret the Council
with the common Fake Premise to produce a liberal result.
Cardinal
Reinhold Marx, Bishop Georg Batzinger and the rest of the German Bishops
Conference are also dishonest and are doing the same. In public there is no
denial from them.
Michael Seewald
could no more produce books which say doctrine and dogma evolve in the Catholic Church. With the
Rational Premise, Inference and Traditional Conclusion he has to return to the
past ecclesiology on salvation, faith and morals. The liturgy can only be based
on the 1962 Missal. Since Vatican Council II is traditionalist when interpreted
rationally. This is the only option we have. It is the ethical interpretation of the
Council.
Seewald read
the Council superficially, with the False Premise and then concluded that
dogmas and doctrine change.
The University of Munich's interpretation of Vatican Council II, the Creeds, Catechisms and dogma extra
ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) is based upon the error of Pope Pius XII made in
the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston. This was the
Boston Heresy case in which Pope Pius XII, Cardinal Richard Cushing, Boston
College and the American Jesuits were guilty. The error spread through the
whole Church.Now it is being repeated by Catholics and Protestants at the University of
Munich.
The
professors could write books without the Boston Heresy of Pope Pius XII. They
would interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc rationally. Then
their concept of religion and politics changes.- Lionel Andrades
Prof. Dr. Michael Seewald
Professorship of Dogmatic Theology and the History of Dogma (Prof. Seewald)
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment