.
- Questions for Kennedy Hall: When the SSPX bishops and priests choose the False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II is this schism? The result is schism?
- When they accept the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston, as did the popes from Pius XII to Francis, is this heresy?
Kennedy Hall receives the Eucharist at
the Latin Mass while reciting the Nicene Creed but changing its meaning with
the common Boston Heresy
At Mass he affirms the 1949 Letter of
the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston which implies that there are
visible cases of the baptism of desire (BOD) and being saved in invincible ignorance (I.I),
for them to be practical exceptions for Feeneyite EENS. So he is not a Feeneyite on EENS.
For Bishop Athanasius Schneider there
are no literal cases of the baptism of desire but for Kennedy Hall there are,
since Archbishop Lefebvre and all the SSPX bishops accepted the 1949 LOHO of
Pius XII.
I have mentioned all this before to
Kennedy Hall on Twitter and there was no comment or denial from him.
I affirm the ecumenism of return of the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX. I accept the Catechism of Pope Pius X (24Q, 27Q) on outside the Church there being no known salvation.For me there are no exceptions. Since I reject the second part of the 1949 LOHO and accept the first part. Vatican Council II (LG 14, LG 16 etc) does not contradict, for me, any of the Catechisms or the Syllabus of Errors.Kennedy Hall cannot say the same. So for me even the SSPX has made a mistake but there is no comment from Hall.
The SSPX and Hall have made an error:
the error of the 1949 LOHO. They wrongly interpret the baptism of desire
and being saved in invincible ignorance, with an irrational premise ( invisible
cases are visible) and irrational inference ( visible cases of BOD and I.I are practical exceptions
for EENS etc). So the non-traditional conclusion is that EENS is obsolete after
the 1949 LOHO and Vatican Council II (irrational).LOHO states every one does not need to enter the Church for salvation. This is heresy. It contradicts the dogma EENS, rejects the Athanasius Creed, makes the Syllabus of Errors obsolete and creates confusion with all the Catechisms, wherever, invincible ignorance is seen as an exception for the Council of Florence on extra ecclesiam nulla salus. So in the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 29 Q -invincible ignorance, would contradict 24Q,27Q- no salvation outside the Church).
Kennedy Hall writes for Life Site News
and Crisis Magazine, where the editor and correspondents, make the same mistake
on the Nicene Creed etc. -Lionel Andrades
MARCH 26, 2023
I go for the SSPX Mass in Latin and I don't interpret Vatican Council II like Bishop Bernard Fellay and Fr. Davide Pagliarani
MARCH 25, 2023
Kasper and Bequart chose the same irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II
MARCH 24, 2023
Biblicum
MARCH 24, 2023
The Boston Heresy is like the Arian heresy of past times
MARCH 23, 2023
The Boston Heresy is an objective error which can be verified in public.
MARCH 23, 2023
Pope Francis supports the Boston Heresy of Pope Pius XII, Cardinal Richard Cushing, the Rector of Boston College and the American Jesuits. This is not Magisterial. Heresy and schism are not Magisterial.
MARCH 23, 2023
A pope cannot be Magisterial who supports the Boston Heresy. He must correct the error.There are no physically visible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance.
MARCH 22, 2023
I have not written books on this subject and I have no intention of writing books in future. But one thing of which I am sure is that - there are no physically visible cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in the present times.
MARCH 22, 2023
Michael Voris and Michael Lofton are not Magisterial when they do not affirm the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) and the Council of Florence (1442) on the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as do the priests of the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX). So why do they say the SSPX is not Magisterial?
MARCH 21, 2023
MARCH 20, 2023
An Augustinian Recollect priest at the church Sant Ildefonso e Tomasso Villanova, via Sistina, Rome, yesterday agreed with me. He said Vatican Council II has a continuity with the past.
MARCH 19, 2023
This is interpreting Church Documents with the Boston Heresy of Pope Pius XII.
MARCH 19, 2023
Without the Boston Heresy of Pope Pius XII, Cardinal Richard Cushing and the Jesuits - the Franciscans of the Immaculate and the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) could interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
APRIL 28, 2018
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 21, 2018
Like Vatican Council II, the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 can be interpreted with the for and against EENS method or the for and neutral to EENS method , with or without the Ladaria Error, with or without the false premise and the conclusion will be different.
So on March 1,2018 Cardinal Luiz Ladaria at the Press Conference on Placuit Deo in answer to a question, said Lumen Gentium 8 was an exception to the old exclusivist understanding of salvation.
No comments:
Post a Comment