The Vortex — Faith with Fangs

Church Militant TV needs to update and correct their page on the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX). I go for Mass at the SSPX chapel in Rome and I interpret Vatican Council II rationally ( LG 16 are hypothetical only. So invincible ignorance does not contradict the dogma EENS or the orthodox passages in CCC 846).

I reject Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally by CMTV and Pope Francis (For them LG 16, invincible ignorance, are physically visible cases in 1965-2023 and so contradict the orthodox passages in Vatican Council II which support 12^th to 16^th century EENS).

I interpret Vatican Council II with a rational premise and inference and so my conclusion is traditional and non heretical. They interpret Vatican Council II with an irrational premise and inference and so their conclusion is heretical and schismatic. The false premise creates a rupture with the past ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church.

So this is my doctrinal position.

I affirm the old theology of the Council of Florence, Cantate Domino, 1442. Christine Niles rejected Cantate Domino, 1442 when she projected hypothetical cases of being saved invincible ignorance as being non hypothetical and objective. She cited the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office in a M’cd Up program on extra ecclesiam nulla salus. So she cited Cantate Domino, Council of Florence, in that program and a) did not clarify that the 1949 LOHO, did not have any exceptions for Cantate Domino. b) Neither did she mention in that program that Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church do not contradict the Council of Florence on the traditional interpretation of EENS.

 Instead Michael Voris has been interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally (in a program with Louie Verecchio etc) and projecting it as a break with Tradition. 

I also affirm the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the Athanasius Creed. But for  CMTV and the Archbishop of Detroit this Creed and the Syllabus is contradicted by Vatican Council II, irrational. They are obsolete. Neither of them interpret the Council rationally and so in harmony with Tradition. 

Since CMTV interprets Vatican Council II irrationally, LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, are explicit cases, examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church. So the Catechism of Pope Pius X (24Q, 27Q) has exceptions for EENS according to CMTV.

This is irrational, heretical, schismatic and non traditional. It cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit. It cannot be Magisterial even if this view is supported by the popes after Vatican Council II.

Michael Voris and Michael Lofton need to clarify that they accept the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) and the Council of Florence, Cantate Domino (1442) which are not contradicted by Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church.

In ‘Fr. Feeney’s Strange Doctrines ‘by Jim Russell (ChurchMilitant.com) April 23, 2019) posted on CMTV, Fr. Leonard Feeney was maligned. He was not obliged to say invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance were physically visible for him. Russell interpreted BOD and I.I in the same irrational way as Pope Pius XII and the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office. How can invisible people be visible examples of salvation outside the Church in 1949 and exceptions for Feeneyite EENS? This was also the irrational interpretation of Rahner, Ratzinger, Kung, Murray and Congar in 1965.

So irrespective of CMTV’s views on Fr. Leonard Feeney the main issue now is Vatican Council II.

1) Vatican Council II is not a rupture with the Council of Florence etc when LG 8, 14, 16 etc refer to only hypothetical and invisible cases.

2) The baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are not objective exceptions for Feeneyite EENS as mentioned in the 1949 LOHO.

These points need to be clarified by CMTV.-Lionel Andrade

s

https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/fr.-feeneys-strange-doctrine

MARCH 28, 2023

It cannot be said, ‘to follow Pope Francis is to follow the Magisterium’ since Pope Francis rejects the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) and the Council of Florence, Cantata Domino (1442) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX when he accepts and interprets Vatican Council II irrationally.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/03/it-cannot-be-said-to-follow-pope.html

 MARCH 26, 2023

I accept Vatican Council II and I accept Tradition. Michael Voris and Michael Lofton do not accept Vatican Council II ( rational) and they reject Tradition ( Church Councils, Catechisms etc) which are contradicted by their irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II, which the SSPX and I reject.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/03/i-accept-vatican-council-ii-and-i.html

 MARCH 23, 2023

A pope cannot be Magisterial who supports the Boston Heresy. He must correct the error.There are no physically visible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/03/a-pope-cannot-be-magisterial-who.html

MARCH 22, 2023

Michael Voris and Michael Lofton are not Magisterial when they do not affirm the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) and the Council of Florence (1442) on the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as do the priests of the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX). So why do they say the SSPX is not Magisterial?

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/03/michael-voris-and-michael-lofton-are.html

MARCH 20, 2023

An Augustinian Recollect priest at the church Sant Ildefonso e Tomasso Villanova, via Sistina, Rome, yesterday agreed with me. He said Vatican Council II has a continuity with the past.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/03/an-augustinian-recollect-priest-at.html

MARCH 19, 2023

This is interpreting Church Documents with the Boston Heresy of Pope Pius XII.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/03/this-is-interpreting-church-documents.html

 MARCH 19, 2023

Without the Boston Heresy of Pope Pius XII, Cardinal Richard Cushing and the Jesuits - the Franciscans of the Immaculate and the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) could interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/03/without-boston-heresy-of-pope-pius-xii.html

MARCH 16, 2023

Archbishop Augustine Di Noia wanted the SSPX to accept Vatican Council II interpreted with the Boston Heresy for canonical recognition

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/03/archbishop-augustine-di-noia-wanted.html

MARCH 16, 2023

The Boston Heresy refers to the public heresy of the popes from Pius XII to Francis. The heresy has infected the whole Church like the Arian heresy of the past. All the cardinals and bishops accept the Boston Heresy of the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/03/those-boston-heresy-refers-to-public.html

MARCH 15, 2023

Wikipedia’s entries on Vatican Council II, extra ecclesiam nulla sales, Fr. Leonard Feeney, Feeneyism, etc reek with the Boston Heresy of the popes from Pius XII to Francis

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/03/wikipedias-entries-on-vatican-council.html

MARCH 6, 2023

It is like watering the roots of a plant or tree. With one simple step, one action, the whole tree is nourished-branches, leaves, roots etc.In the same way by choosing the rational premise we return to the past in faith and morals, liturgy,. mission, ecclesiology etc

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/03/it-is-like-watering-roots-of-plant-or.html

MARCH 6, 2023

The understanding of the Apostles' Creed or the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed. has been changed with the Irrational Premise : the Church now teaches that there is known salvation outside the Church

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/03/the-understanding-of-apostles-creed-or.html

 MARCH 6, 2023

Model A and Model B - Vatican Council II

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/03/model-and-model-b-vatican-council-ii.html

_________________________________