Archbishop Augustine di Noia cannot teach Vatican Council II in harmony with the teachings of St. Dominic : American Dominicans in Rome teach errors like the Cathars in 1216

 

How can Archbishop Augustine Di Noia op be  considered a Catholic when he interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally. This is political ideology.It is  supported by the Masons. This is not the traditional Magisterium.

In Kerala, India a Catholic religious community of traditionalist sisters who support the SSPX are being persecuted because they do not interpret Vatican Council II irrationally like the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF), Vatican. The SSPX does not accept Vatican Council interpreted irrationally. So the rest of the Church, which does, persecutes them.

Since Archbishop Augustine di Noia cannot accept Vatican Council II in harmony with the teachings on salvation,  according to  St. Dominic and the founders of the Dominicans, , he should resign.

ST.DOMINIC AND POPE HONOROUS III

In 1215 St. Dominic along with six other men founded a house in Toulouse, France with the approval of the bishop, and began evangelising.The pope who said outside the Church there is no salvation, approved their Order.In December 1216 Pope Honorius III approved the Order of Preachers and they were to preach the Gospel to save souls from going to Hell. 

DOMINICANS REJECT HONOURIOUS INTERPRETATION OF EENS

But the Dominicans are not doing that today.With Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally they reject Pope Honorius' interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) approves this heresy and schism..

How can we have a Dominican Order and a  the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith who choose to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally? This is normal for the Dominican Archbishop Augustine di Noia, who is the American Secretary of the CDF.

AMERICAN DOMINICANS SPREAD ERROR LIKE THE CATHARS IN 1216

In Rome, he must ask the faculty at the Dominican University of St. Thomas Aquinas to interpret Vatican Council II rationally. The Angelicum must not teach students error for political reasons.The Ameican Rector and Dean of Theology are teaching public error and do not deny it.The American Dominicans are spreading heresy and error here like the Cathars at the time of St. Dominic.All the religious communities are affected.

CANONICAL RECOGNITION MUST ONLY BE GIVEN TO THOSE TO INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY

The CDF, must inform Cardinal Braz Avez, to interpret Vatican Council II only rationally and then grant canonical recognition to only those religious communities, which interpret Vatican Council II ethically. Canonical recognition must not freely be given to the Dominicans, Jesuits and others.Why must priests, bishops and cardinals follow Archbishop Augustine de Noia and the CDF’s dishonest interpretation of Vatican Council II to get canonical recognition? Why should the auxiliary bishops in Rome teach official heresy and schism and get away with it ? 

BISHOP DANIEL LIBANORI DOES NOT TELL ECUMENICAL GATHERING ABOUT EENS

Bishop Daniel Libanori, auxiliary bishop in Rome, the other day participated in an ecumenical Via Crucis, without informing non Catholics that the Catholic Church accepts the traditional strict interpretation of EENS according to Vatican Council II(AG 7, LG 14) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church ( 845.846 etc). So all non Catholics in Rome, need to enter the Catholic Church, Jesus' Mystical Body, to avoid Hell.All need Catholic Faith and the baptism of water ( AG 7). The Catholic Church has not rejected the Fourth Lateran Council 1215 and the Council of Florence 1442.Both these Councils are not contradicted by Vatican Council II not interpreted rationally. The Council does not have any exceptions for the dogma EENS. LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are always only hypothetical cases.So there can only be an ecumenism of return according to Vatican Council II.When I refer to Vatican Council II I mean only Vatican Council II, rational.

ARCHBISHOP RUZZA WANTS THE FRANCISCANS OF THE IMMACULATE TO ACCEPT VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONAL

The bishop in my diocese of Porta Santa Rufina, Rome is Archbishop GianRicco Ruzza. He does not interpret Vatican Council II rationally and is also the bishop of Civitavecchia. He wants the Franciscans of the Immaculate to accept Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally. They will not do so. So their seminary and old church in Boccea, Rome, in the parish Santa Maria di Nazareth, lies closed. All the other seminaries in Rome accept Vatican Council II and interpret it irrationally.So Pope Francis sends students to the pontifical universities. He knows that they will then interpret the Council, irrationally as he does.

SCHOLARSHIPS FOR NON CHRISTIANS WHO ACCEPT VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONAL

In Germany, Austria and Belgium scholarships are available for non Catholics and non Christian students, to study Catholic theology at Catholic universities, if they agree to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally.

I INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY

I go for Holy Mass in Italian or Latin and I interpret Vatican Council II rationally. I affirm the Fourth Lateran Council and the Council of Florence which are not contradicted by Vatican Council II interpreted rationally. There is no development of doctrine and dogma for me, since there is no known salvation outside the Church in 1965-2023. - Lionel Andrades