SSPX priest
in Rome denies the Faith before non Christians
Another week
and he will not answer. I asked him the same question. He is afraid. He knows
what I am saying and he knows that he must not answer. It’s tough for the both
of us. We know what the stakes are. It makes no difference for me in the sense
I have past the point of no return but not him. He knows the implications and
the sacrifices he has to make our big. So he wants to avoid it. He does not
want to talk about it. It is something too sensitive. He agrees with me and we
are on the same wavelength but he does not want to make his position known. He
wants to be prudent like just about everyone else.
The priest
who offered the Palm Sunday Mass at the SSPX chapel in Rome yesterday morning avoided
me again before the Mass and he was cautioning everyone else not to talk to me.
Why? Since
the subject is extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Leftist police, non
Christians, are targeting Catholics, especially missionaries and those
interested in evengelisation with traditional Catholic doctrine supported by
Vatican Council II which is ecclesiocentric and missionary.
Fr. Federico
Montani the SSPX priest who offered the Mass would not answer if Lumen Gentium
8, 14 and 16 etc, in Vatican Council II referred to invisible cases only in
2023.Since if they referred to visible cases for him, then he was really
telling the non Christian police in Rome, that he does not affirm the Fourth
Lateran Council (1215) and the Council of Florence (1442) which defined extra
ecclesiam nulla salus and did not mention any exceptions. When LG 8 etc are
explicit then this is liberalism. It is the public heresy of popes from Paul VI
to Francis, in their rejection of the rational interpretation of Vatican
Council II.
It is well
known that for the SSPX bishops Vatican Council II is a rupture with Tradition.
For years Fr. Montani has been teaching this and it was part of his religious
formation with the SSPX. So they infer that LG 8 etc refer to visible cases.
Invisible people cannot be objective examples of salvation outside the Church
in the present times and so practical exceptions for the Council of Florence
etc.
So Fr.
Montani and the SSPX really reject the dogma EENS according to the Fourth
Lateran Council and this sits well with the local police. There are visible
exceptions for EENS is the political position of the SSPX and the liberals.
The SSPX
priest is telling the police, which monitor the chapel and other churches here
that he is not Anti Semitic, racists and other control-labels of the Left. His
interpretation of Vatican Council II is not continuity with Tradition.
This is a
denial of the Catholic Faith. By projecting LG 8 etc as being physically
visible cases in the present times. The SSPX priests at Albano, Italy, are changing
the interpretation of the Nicene Creed and the Apostles Creed and rejecting the
Athanasius Creed. The Catechisms of Trent and Pius X which affirm the dogma
EENS are made obsolete. This is bringing the liberal division into the Catholic
Church.
I go for the
SSPX Mass but I do not interpret Vatican Council II like Bishop Bernard Fellay
and Fr. Davide Pagliarani whom Fr. Federico Montani follows.
The irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II, the Creeds and Catechisms was a mistake of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, Fr. Franz Schmidberger, Fr.
Nicklaus Pfluger, Roberto dei Mattei, the Hildebrands, Fr. Nicholas Gruner,
John Vennari, Christopher Ferrara and many others.
YOUNG PEOPLE AT THE SSPX MASS AGREE WITH ME
Yesterday
morning I spoke to three young men before the Mass. They agreed with me. There
are no invisible cases of a non Catholic saved in invincible ignorance or the
baptism of desire. If anyone was saved as such they would only be known to God.
I showed them a page which listed LG 8, 14 and 16 etc as being ‘Invisible Cases’.
I also showed them a page in color which
listed Ad Gentes 7, Lumen Gentium 14, the Catechism of the Catholic Church
845,846 etc supporting 'Exclusive Salvation in the Catholic Church'.
The page
which listed invisible cases does not contradict the page with citations showing
the Church still today teaches that there is exclusive salvation and this is
mentioned in Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
These young
men attend the SSPX Mass in Albano Lazio where the local bishop is Vincenzo
Viva and the emeritus bishop is Cardinal Marcello Semeraro. They both
interpret Vatican Council II as a break with Tradition by choosing the
irrational premise. The liberals and traditionalists have something in common at Albano. -Lionel Andrades
MARCH 6, 2023
SSPX's Father Federico Montani must only be allowed to interpret Vatican Council II honestly and so rationally at the Latin Mass in Rome. This is a legal point. He is correct when he rejects Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church interpreted irrationally and so dishonestly
FEBRUARY 28, 2023
Father Federico Montani must only be allowed to interpret Vatican Council II honestly and so rationally at the Latin Mass in Rome. This is a legal point. He is correct when he rejects Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church interpreted irrationally and so dishonestly
Father Federico Montani will not be given permission by Cardinal Arthur Roche to offer the Latin Mass at the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) chapel in Rome because of his rejection of Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church. But if he demands that the pope and cardinals interpret Vatican Council II rationally and ethically and accept the traditional and honest conclusion, things could be different. Since Vatican Council II can only be interpreted ethically and rationally and the conclusion has to be traditional only- and the popes and cardinals are not doing this.
The responsibility lies with the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican and not the Superior of the SSPX, Albano,Italy or the other religious communities, like the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate of Fr. Stefano Manelli f.i or the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, Still River, MA, USA.
The Vatican is illegal when it chooses a Fake Premise to interpret Vatican Council II. The cardinals cannot pretend that this is normal and legal.
Fr. Mantoni has a legal right to be able to interpret Vatican Council II rationally and honestly. He must not be forced to be dishonest by the Vatican and the Left.
If he announces that he chooses to accept Vatican Council II rationally and honestly and so come in harmony with Tradition, without rejecting Vatican Council II, will the Vatican accept it? Will this be enough to officially allow him to continue to offer the Latin Mass? Will it be the same for other religious communities in Italy and throughout the world?
The SSPX must ask this of the Vatican- only clarify a legal point.
The Vatican and the Left must interpret the Council honestly at every Mass, Latin or Novus Ordo. The members of the Vatican Tribunal are obliged to interpret Vatican Council II rationally and honestly. Even Cardinal Angelo Becciu must be granted this right.
The Judges of the Vatican Supreme Tribunal must only interpret the Council rationally. This is obligatory. Catechesis for the children of the secular judges of the secular courts in Rome must only be based upon Vatican Council II interpreted honestly.
Father Federico Montani must only be allowed to interpret Vatican Council II honestly and so rationally at the Latin Mass in Rome. This is a legal point. He is correct when he rejects Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church interpreted irrationally and so dishonestly. - Lionel Andrades
FEBRUARY 27, 2023
Se la FSSPX interpreta razionalmente il Concilio Vaticano II la loro immagine cambia
FEBRUARY 27, 2023
If the SSPX interprets Vatican Council II rationally their image changes
FEBRUARY 27, 2023
Il sacerdote della FSSPX non è etico riguardo al Concilio Vaticano II
FEBRUARY 27, 2023
SSPX priest is unethical on Vatican Council II
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment