We don’t need the Kasper-Fellay version of Vatican Council II.

 

Vatican Council II supports the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). So why is religious liberty an issue? It is not.

Why must the New Ecumenism be an issue? The Council supports an ecumenism of return only.

Why is there concern over the New Missal for the traditionalists? The Council can only be interpreted with the old ecclesiology of the 1962 Missal.There is no other rational choice.

Where is there a New Theology when the Council agrees with Feeneyite EENS? There is no liberalism when the Council is interpreted rationally.

So why must Vatican Council II be interpreted dishonestly and politically ? Why must we follow Bishop Bernard Fellay and Cardinal Walter Kasper?

We have a choice. If Vatican Council II is Anti Semitic then so is the Bible, the Catechisms, the Creeds and Jesus Christ.We have a Council which is not a break with Tradition.We don’t need the Kasper-Fellay version of Vatican Council II. - Lionel Andrades