MAY 25, 2023
CMTV is still not telling Catholics to interpret Vatican Council II rationally.CMTV must refuse to interpret Vatican Council II like the Archbishop of Detroit, the CDF and the ADL.
MAY 25, 2023
CMTV must refuse to interpret Vatican Council II like the Archbishop of Detroit, the CDF and the ADL.
There is no clarification or correction from Michael Voris at Church Militant TV. He agrees with me. There is no denial. He is not telling Catholics that they can interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II as being invisible, hypothetical and speculative cases only. They are not visible and practical examples of salvation outside the Church and so are not exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and the Athanasius Creed. They do not contradict the Syllabus of Error of Pope Pius IX on an ecumenism of return to the Church. They are not a break with the past ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church. They do not contradict the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church which is not expressed in the New Evangelisation, New Ecclesiology, New Ecumenism and New Theology.
LG 8 etc have a continuity with Tradition and this is not wanted by the liberals and Masons.They are possibilities known only to God, when all needing faith and baptism of water for salvation, is also a possibility known to God. If anyone is saved outside the Catholic Church it is not part of our human reality. We cannot meet and see such cases.
So if Michael Voris says that LG 8,14, 16 etc refer to only hypothetical cases and not objective exceptions for the dogma EENS and the Syllabus of Errors, CMTV will be saying that all Jews, Muslims and other non Christians, are oriented to Hell without faith and baptism in the Catholic Church and that in Heaven there are only Catholics.
This would be opposed by the political left.
The Archbishop of Detroit and the Vatican would excommunicate him, like ‘the Church’ excommunicated Fr. Leonard Feeney politically, for affirming the Fourth Lateran Council and the Council of Florence on traditional EENS. The ADL would put restrictions on CMTV as a media.
CMTV should really refuse to interpret Vatican Council II like the Archbishop of Detroit, the CDF and the ADL. - Lionel Andrades
MAY 24, 2023
CMTV is still not telling Catholics to interpret Vatican Council II rationally
Michael Voris, Simon Rafe, Christine Niles, Bradley Eili and Jules Gomes are still not affirming the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) in harmony with Vatican Council II interpreted rationally. They want to avoid trouble with the Attorney General in Detroit and the Archbishop of Detroit Allen Vigneron. So they are politically correct with the Left on Catholic doctrine, like the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican. They are calling this irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II Magisterial, since it is supported politically by Pope Francis and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj, Prefect of the CDF, who are unethical and dishonest, like them at CMTV.
This is a scandal. For political reasons Church Militant TV is rejecting the dogma EENS and re-interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally and they are not telling Catholics to avoid this error.-Lionel Andrades
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/05/cmtv-is-still-not-telling-catholics-to.html
MAY 21, 2023
Public mortal sins which Pope Francis and the CDF must correct
PUBLIC MORTAL SINS WHICH POPE FRANICS AND THE CDF MUST CORRECT
Pope Francis has committed the following mortal sins.These are some which come to mind off hand.They are as follows.
1). He interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally. So his conclusion is heretical and schismatic.It changes the interpretation of de fide teachings, Creeds and Catechisms.
2). Since he interprets Vatican Council II irrationally, he changes the interpretation of the Nicene Creed. Again this is heretical.It is schism with the Magisterium over the centuries.They did not interpret the Creeds with the irrational premise.They did not interpret the baptism of desire with the irrational premise.
3). Since he interprets Vatican Council II and the baptism of desire etc irrationally, he rejects the Athanasius Creed.This Creeds says all need to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation. The pope is saying there are known exceptions in the present times. He implies that there are visible non Catholics saved outside the Church. This is first class heresy according to the hierarchy of truths of Pope John Paul II (Ad Teuendem Fidem).To contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus or the Athanasius Creed there would have to be physically visible exceptoins. It is only then that EENS etc become obsolete.Invisible cases cannot be exceptions for EENS in the present times ( 1949-2023).
4) Since he has interpreted Vatican Council II irrationally he has produced a new ecclesiology and so justifies changes in traditional morals too, as in the case of Amoris Laetitia etc.He has not excommunicated the German bishops who also justify their moral liberalism. They base it upon Vatican Council II irrational. - Lionel Andrades
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/05/public-mortal-sins-which-pope-francis.html
MAY 21, 2023
Michael Voris is not telling viewers that Vatican Council II can be interpreted rationally and then the Council will be in harmony with the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) :The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith is Cushingite and political on this issue and so not Magisterial
Michael Voris is not telling viewers that Vatican Council II can be interpreted rationally and then the Council will be in harmony with the Fourth Lateran Council (1215), which he does not support for political reasons. He does not want to be labeled a Feeneyite.It would be Anti Semitic for the Jewish Left.
So he leaves Catholics in the dark, uninformed. He looks after his liberal reputation and the financial position of Church Militant TV. In the Vortex, 'lies and truths' are no more captured on this issue, since it could be expensive. Neither can he criticize the US bishops or the SSPX for not interpreting Vatican Council II rationally instead of irrationally, since then he would have to do the same.
CDF WAS NOT MAGISTERIAL IN THE 1949 LETTER
Michael Voris says that he follows the Magisterium of the Church and so also the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican.
1. But the CDF was Cushingite in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office (CDF) to the Archbishop of Boston. The CDF chose the irrational premise to interpret the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance. This is was unethical and not Catholic. It was political.
2.The CDF was also Cushingite at Vatican Council II (1965). It interpreted invisible cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, as being visible exceptions for the dogma EENS according to the Fourth Lateran Council.
This Council says all need to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation and the CDF, in the 1949 Letter says not everyone needs to enter the Church for salvation, as if there are personally known exceptions for them in the present times.
Even today the CDF projects Vatican Council II as a rupture with the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors. This is an objective mistake in public and cannot be Magisterial. This is political and not Catholic.
The CDF was also not Magisterial on this issue during the pontificate of Pope Benedict. As Prefect of the CDF, Pope Benedict rejected the Athanasius Creed, Syllabus of Errors and 16th century EENS of the missionaries. They were rejected in the name of Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally.
The rational interpretation of Vatican Council II would not be appreciated or tolerated by the Mosaad, the Pasdaran and the equivalent organization in Saudi Arabia.
So Michael Voris and the CDF choose to interpret Vatican Council II deceptively and politically and they wrongly call it the magisterium.-Lionel Andrades
MAY 20, 2023
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment