Are the cardinals still going to interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture and not a continuation with the past exclusivist ecclesiology? Will Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF), Vatican, still interpret Vatican Council II, politically, as a rupture with Feeneyite EENS ?

 

We now know that Vatican Council II can be interpreted rationally with LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, referring to hypothetical cases only. They are theoretical and exist only in our mind. So they cannot be practical exceptions for Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) or EENS according to the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) and the Council of Florence (1442). They are not exceptions for EENS according to the Bible.

So are the cardinals still going to interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture and not a continuation with the past exclusivist ecclesiology?

Will Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF), Vatican, still interpret Vatican Council II, politically, as a rupture with Feeneyite EENS ? We are back to Tradition .We can accept a Feeneyite interpretation of the Bible. 

With the rational premise ( invisible people are invisible in the present times) there is no development of doctrine.

BOD, BOB and I.I no more contradict Feeneyite EENS.Feeneyism accepts hypothetical cases of BOD, BOB and I.I. They are not an issue as long as they are not projected as practical exceptions for EENS.

So the liberal-traditionalist division in the Catholic Church ends because there is no more a theological basis for the liberalism.The rational interpretation of Vatican Council II does not support liberalism.

There is no more schism with the pre-1949  Magisterium of the Catholic Church.- Lionel Andrades