Catholics
can no more cite Vatican Council II to project a liberal image. We now know
that the Council is ‘rigid’, exclusivist and traditional.
I am
following Vatican Council II. A pope cannot out of the blue re-interpret
Vatican Council II irrationally and claim the Council contradicts Tradition, in
particular the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).So based upon this
dishonesty he cannot make radical changes in faith and morals, like, for
example, Amoris Laetitia and the Abu Dhabi Declaration.
I am
following the Council. I interpret it rationally. It is not a break with
Tradition for me.I am not innovating.
So the judge
in the Fr. George de Laire-Michael Voris case 1 in New Hampshire, USA must only interpret Vatican Council II rationally.
This is being ethical.
This also has a direct bearing on the case.
Fr. Georges de Laire and the Curia in the
Diocese of Manchester are interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally. They
are also interpreting the baptism of desire etc irrationally. So if they are
told to interpret the baptism of desire etc rationally they would have to
affirm Fourth Lateran Council (1215), in other words, Feeneyite EENS.The Council would not have any exceptions for Feeneyite EENS. Invisile people cannot be visible examples of salvation outside the Church and objective exceptions for the traditional ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church.
Fr. Laire
has issued a Decree of Prohibitions against Brother Andre Marie micm, the
Superior of the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, at Richmond, New
Hampshire. Since, the Slaves affirm Feeneyite EENS which he would be obliged to
do also, if he did not interpret Vatican Council II, the baptism of desire etc , irrationally and dishonestly.But for the false premise, the confusion over what is invisible and visible, he would be a confirmed Feeneyite like those against whom he has issued the Decree.
It may be mentioned that over the centuries the popes and saints( Aquinas, Augustine, Francis of Assisi etc) were Feeneyite. Since it is common sense that the baptism of desire etc are not visible cases on earth. If any one is saved with the baptism of desire etc he would be Heaven and unknown to any one on earth.
Bishop Peter
Libasci, the bishop of Manchester and the Curia’s dishonesty is public. They do
not deny that they officially interpret Vatican Council II irrationally, as
does the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican.
The Judiciary
in New Hampshire in general must be honest and transparent.- Lionel Andrades
1
https://bloximages.newyork1.vip.townnews.com/unionleader.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/f/b2/fb201325-
No comments:
Post a Comment