Jules Gomes, Gaven Ashden, Bradley Eli, Diane Montagna and others do not discuss this issue to protect their self interests, their finances, careers etc. If Diane Montage called attention to this issue at the Press Conference with Cardinal Grech he could ask her if she interpreted Vatican Council II rationally and she could answer 'no'.If she said 'yes' she would lose her press credentials

 

Gaven Ashden, Michael Nazir Ali, Jules Gomes and other Anglican converts into the Catholic Church, are prudently not interpreting Vatican Council II rationally.In this way they do not have to affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to the Fourth Lateran Council (1215).It did not mention exceptions. They have also probably been warned.They have been told that it is obligatory for political reasons to interpret the Council with a Fake Premise to create a fake break with Catholic Tradition.This is necessary to remain in good standing in the Catholic Church.

Ashden would not be allowed to write for the Catholic Herald, U.K if he interpreted Vatican Council II with the rational premise and inference to produce a traditional conclusion.The Anglican Ordinariate at Walsingham would disown him.

Even Mons. Michael Nazir Ali is knowingly interpreting Vatican Council II like Cardinal Vincent Nichols and the liberals.

If they interpreted the Council rationally, then Lumen Gentium 8 and Ad Gentes 7 would be saying that all need faith and baptism for salvation. All. LG 14 is placed in the Catechism of the Catholic Church 846 under the title Outside the Church No Salvation. It would also mean that LG 14 and AG 7 would not be contradicted by hypothetical cases of LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc.They are invisible in 1965-2023. Invisible cases cannot be objective exceptions for LG 14 and AG 7 or the dogma EENS.

So when Dr. Jules Gomes sends his dispatches to Church Militant TV, from Rome, he is careful not to bring up this subject. Since if he interprets Vatican Council II rationally and so affirms Feeneyite EENS, with LG 14 and LG 16 and EENS, having no exceptions, then he would be labeled Anti Semitic. CMTV would ask him to leave or they would be accused of being the same.

So Dr. Jules Gomes does not say that the Synod innovation comes with Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally. If Cardinal Grech and Sister Nathalie Bequart interpreted the Council rationally, they would have to affirm the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church. So there would be no change in faith and morals.

Sister Bequart has said that the Synod is based upon Vatican Council II.She is frank. She meant that when the Council is interpreted irrationally, i.e LG 8,14,16 etc refer to visible cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church who are objective exceptions for the dogma EENS, then Tradition has been made obsolete. 

So when the Council makes Tradition obsolete why cannot they innovate in faith and morals and have married priests, approve LGBT sex as not being a sin. support polygamy, divorce and remarriage and other mortal sins. Since there is a  new moral theology based upon Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally.

Jules Gomes, Gaven Ashden, Bradley Eli, Diane Montagna and others do not discuss this issue to protect their self interests, their finances, careers etc. If Diane Montage called attention to this issue at the Press Conference with Cardinal Grech he could ask her if she interpreted Vatican Council II rationally and she would have to answer 'no', or lose her press credentials..-Lionel Andrades

• Report

• Social networks

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • VK
  • Weibo
  • LinkedIn
  • Tumblr
  • Pinterest

• Remove share

Seidenspinner

142.1Kyesterday

Diane Montagna asks why is Church teaching on sexual morality up for discussion? Cardinal Hollerich replies that Church teaching is not up for debate, only how to be welcoming. Cardinal Grech says the …More

04:29

and that's the whole content of the session today.