The Synods have to be cancelled. They are based on the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II . It would be dishonest to keep repeating the mistake. Cardinals Grech and Hollerich and Sister Nathalie Bequart and Cardinal Marx and Bishop Batzing, interpret the Council irrationally.

 

We now have a Vatican Council II which is rational and traditional. So Cardinal Grech and Hollerich's Instrumental Laboris  of the Synod, is obsolete. How can you have a Synod which comes ‘out of the blue’ and supports polygamous, homosexual-sex and other mortal sins of faith?

They cannot justify all their irrationalism, with a traditional Vatican Council II which supports only the old exclesiology of the 16^th century Roman Missal at the Latin Mass. 

Now that we can interpret Vatican Council II rationally – there can be only one interpretation of the Council. The irrational version is obsolete. So Pope Francis, the cardinals and the bishops, are not apostolic and magisterial in their irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II. They have to switch to the rational option, which is apostolic and magisterial. The rational interpretation with LG 8, 14,16 etc being only hypothetical and theoretical, is not in schism with the past Magisterium over the centuries.

So the Synods have to be cancelled. They are based on the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II . It would be dishonest to keep repeating the mistake. Cardinals Grech and Hollerich and Sister Nathalie Bequart and Cardinal Marx and Bishop Batzing, interpret the Council irrationally. - Lionel Andrades

JUNE 27, 2023

Cardinals Grech and Hollerich say at the last Synod Press Conference that “we don’t judge” but the Bible tells us we can judge, we can judge which sins will take us to Hell. Jesus judges.

 

Cardinals Grech and Hollerich say at the last Synod Press Conference that “we don’t judge” but the Bible tells us we can judge, we can judge which sins will take us to Hell. Jesus judges. Also, the cardinals Grech and Hollerich have judged that Catholics can interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and produce a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).

The dogma EENS, the Athanasius Creed and Syllabus of Errors of Pius IX, judge, that non Catholic Christians are outside the Catholic Church.They judge that they are oriented to Hell without Catholic faith and the baptism of water, in the Catholic Church.

In the Gospel Reading from Matthew last Sunday at Mass in Italian, Jesus said that those who deny Him before men he will deny before His Father in Heaven. Jesus and His Mystical Body the Catholic Church are denied, when we interpret the Creeds, Catechisms, Councils and especially Vatican Council II irrationally. 

Hollerich and Grech are denying Jesus when they create a New Church, a false new church, to please the Left and Satan.

St. Nathalie Bequart, Consultant at the Synod, has judged that when she interprets Vatican Council II in Lumen Gentium 8,14 and 16 etc, as referring to objective cases in 2023, of non Catholics saved outside the Church, then Vatican Council II is a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the rest of Tradition.

Then she ‘judges’ that since Vatican Council II is a break with Tradition, it is possible to have polygamy, approved LGBT-sex etc,etc. 

Hollerich and Grech ‘judge’ that Nathalie Bequart is correct. 

Then they all ‘judge’ that their ‘listening Church’ and ‘walking together’ New Church, is meaningful.They call this proclaiming the Gospel.They indicate wrongly that this is  and traditional mission. This is false. Since mission over the centuries, was always ecclesiocentric.It was based on exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. But they have judged otherwise.

They do not want to ‘walk together’ and ‘listen’ to Catholics who cite the Bible, Tradition and the past Magisterium. - Lionel Andrades

 

JUNE 22, 2023

Why should all the cardinals and bishops interpret Vatican Council II, the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms like cardinals Hollerich and Grech and Pope Francis and not like me? They have an obligation to be honest.

Cardinals  Hollerich and Grech’s  ‘listening’ and ‘walking together’ is based upon Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally and not rationally, a Council which is dishonest and not honest, heretical and not orthodox , nontraditional instead of traditional and public schism with the past Magisterium over the centuries.

This is the official heresy of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican and Pope Francis.

It is an objective and factual public error in the interpretation of Magisterial Documents (Creeds, Catechisms etc). It cannot be called Magisterial. For it to be Magisterial the interpretation has to be rational only.

The two cardinals and Sister Nathalie Bequart interpret LG 8, 14 and 16, UR 3, NA 2, Gs 22 etc in Vatican Council II as being physically visible cases in 1965-2023. Since LG 8 etc are objective exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, they imply that these are visible cases, objectively known non Catholics saved outside the Catholic Church. They would have to be visible. Since invisible people cannot be objective exceptions for the dogma EENS of the Fourth Lateran Council (1215), which did not mention any exceptions.

So these cardinals and Sister Nathalie Bequart do not want the past exclusivist ecclesiology on mission, salvation, matrimony, LGBT sex etc. So they have interpreted Vatican Council II irrationally in the Methodology of the first session of the 16^th Ordinary General Assembly of the Synod of Bishops on the these:” For a synodal Church: communion, participation, mission”( 4 to 29 October 2023).By interpreting the Council irrationally in October they will not judge polygamy as a sin just as divorce and re-marriage is not a sin for Pope Francis. Cardinal Walter Kasper has said that if Vatican Council II can change the ecclesiology of the Church why cannot the divorce and remarried be given the Eucharist at Mass. He means Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally. 

They know that with Vatican Council II interpreted rationally i.e. LG 8, 14, 16 etc being only hypothetical and invisible cases in 1965-2023, there are no exceptions for the dogma EENS, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors. The Church returns to traditional mission based upon exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. Inter faith marriages are adultery and the couple should not receive the Eucharist. Practicing homosexuals also should not be given the Eucharist until they repent and change their lifestyle. These are the traditional teachings of the Church which are supported by Vatican Council II. The Council, interpreted rationally, has the hermeneutic of continuity with Feeneyite EENS and the rest of Tradition.

So with the discovery of Vatican Council II, rational, we are back to the past exclusivist ecclesiology, traditional faith and morals, and the old understanding of mission which is ecclesiocentric and also Christocentric.

This also requires ‘listening to’ and ‘walking together’ and ‘not being judgmental’.

I interpret Vatican Council II rationally. So the Council does not contradict Feeneyite EENS and the Fourth Lateran Council. There is no change in the exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church for me. I am following the pre and post Vatican Council II Magisterium which does not change. Pope Francis and cardinals Hollerich and Grech are not doing the same. In this sense they are not Magisterial. Dishonesty is not Magisterial.

I follow the traditional teachings of the Church on homosexual sex being a mortal sin, inter faith marriages being adultery, polygamy being a grave sin etc. These moral teachings are not contradicted by Vatican Council II interpreted rationally with the hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition. Pope Francis and cardinals Hollerich and Grech and Sr. Nathalie Bequart cannot say the same. They are not Magisterial when they reject the past Magisterium by using a false premise and inference to create new theologies and a new ecclesiology.

Why should all the cardinals and bishops interpret Vatican Council II, the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms like cardinals Hollerich and Grech and Pope Francis and not like me? They have an obligation to be honest.- Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/06/why-should-all-cardinals-and-bishops.html

_____________________________________________________________________________________

JUNE 22, 2023

This is not Magisterial. They are interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally. They are choosing the false premise and inference to create a fake break with Tradition. This is a mortal sin since the Creeds are changed. Cardinals Grech and Hollerich cease to be cardinals until the scandal is ended. This press conference is political and not Catholic. This is a fake Gospel and not traditional mission based upon exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. Jesus and the Bible judge. Jesus tells us people go to Hell.

Notice of Press Conference, 14.06.2023

On Tuesday 20 June 2023, at 14.30, in the Holy See Press Office, Saint Pius X Hall, Via dell’Ospedale 1, a press conference will be held to present the Instrumentum Laboris and Methodology of the first session of the 16^th Ordinary General Assembly of the Synod of Bishops on the theme: “For a synodal Church: communion, participation, mission” (4 to 29 October 2023).

The speakers will be:

- His Eminence Cardinal Mario Grech, secretary general of the Synod;

- His Eminence Cardinal Jean-Claude Hollerich, S.J., archbishop of Luxembourg, general rapporteur of the 16^th Ordinary General Assembly of the Synod of Bishops (by remote link);

- Fr. Giacomo Costa, S.J., consultor of the General Secretariat of the Synod of Bishops.

During the meeting, brief testimonies on the preparation of members for the October Assembly and the possible use of the Instrumentum Laboris by local groups will be presented by

- Helena Jeppesen-Spuhler, Lenten Fund (Switzerland) member of the Swiss delegation to the Continental Assembly in Prague;

- Fr. Rafael Simbine Junior, secretary general of SECAM (by remote link)

- Sr. Nadia Coppa, A.S.C., president of the UISG.

The press conference will be livestreamed in the original language on the Vatican News YouTube channel, at https://www.youtube.com/c/VaticanNews.

https://press.vatican.va/content/salastampa/en/bollettino/pubblico/2023/06/14/230614b.html

This is not Magisterial. They are interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally. They are choosing the false premise and inference to create a fake break with Tradition. This is a mortal sin since the Creeds are changed. Cardinals Grech and Hollerich cease to be cardinals until the scandal is ended. This press conference is political and not Catholic. This is a fake Gospel and not traditional mission based upon exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. Jesus and the Bible judge. Jesus tells us people go to Hell...- Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/06/this-is-not-magisterialthey-are.html

 

 

NOVEMBER 28, 2022

The present two popes interpret Vatican Council II and the Creeds, Catechisms and EENS etc with the Irrational Premise to avoid being Anti Semitic. This is not Catholic and it is political-left.With the Rational Premise there is nothing in the Council-text to contradict the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus

The present two popes interpret Vatican Council II and the Creeds, Catechisms and EENS etc with the Irrational Premise to avoid being Anti Semitic. This is not Catholic and it is political-left.With the Rational Premise there is nothing in the Council-text to contradict the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

TRADITIONALISTS CHOOSE THE FALSE PREMISE

Even the cardinals and bishops follow the ADL. The traditionalists too use the Fake Premise to interpret Vatican Council II as a break with Feeneyite EENS to avoid being labeled Anti Semitic and have their conferences, new books and talks legally prohibited. Church Militant TV for example, often criticizes the SSPX  and is politically correct with the Left but CMTV does not affirm EENS without exceptions. CMTV chooses to not affirm Vatican Council II with no exceptions for EENS.Michael Voris and Christine Niles choose not to affirm the baptism of desire as being only physically invisible and hypothetical cases in the present times. In the same way the SSPX interprets Vatican Council II irrationally like the present two popes to avoid the Anti Semitic charge and have their property confiscated etc.

VATICAN COUNCIL II DOES NOT CONTRADICT THE ATHANASIUS CREED AND THE CDF NOTIFCATION ON FR.JACQUES DUPUIS SJ

I don't have property and I do not ask for donations.I affirm the strict interpretation of EENS; the Feeneyite version, hated by the Left. I can only interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise and Inference. This is the normal thing to do.It is honest and rational. So Vatican Council II, for me, does not contradict the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors and the Catechism of Pope Pius IX ( 24Q,27Q).

The Council does not contradict the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Notification on Fr. Jacques Dupuis sj (2001) during the pontificate of Pope John Paul II. It does not contradict the pro-ecclesiocentric-ecclesiology statements of Dominus Iesus (2000) of Pope John Paul II.I am a Feeneyite on EENS and  VC2 but the popes, cardinals and bishops are Cushingites.

Cushingism produces bad fruit.It always produces the hermeneutic of rupture.Yet it is chosen by the sedevacantists Bishops Pivarunas and Sanborn.They have property.

CDF ISSUES A POLITICAL DECREE OF PROHIBITION

Feeneyism maintains the hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition on VC2 and EENS when Brother Andre Marie MICM and the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, St. Benedict Center, Richmond, New Hampshire choose it, as their philosophy and theology.Presently in the diocese of Manchester, USA, Bishop Libasci is a Cushingite and he is forcing the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary to interpret Magisterial Documents ( Creeds etc) irrationally, as he does. He was supported with this irrationality by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican and the Left.Bishop Libasci and Fr.Georges de Laire, Judicial Vicar,in New Hampshire, want to remain politically correct.So they have issued a political Decree of Prohibitions against the religious community at the St.Benedict Center NH.

CDF DOES NOT CORRECT NEW YORK TIMES' RUTH GRAHAM AND ROSS DOUTHAT

The CDF has approved the St. Benedict Center in the diocese of Worcester, USA, under Bishop Robert McManus.The prior is Brother Thomas Augustine micm. Since Brother Thomas Augustine at the St.Benedict Center in Still River,MA, interprets Vatican Council II with the Irrational Premise he produces the needed 'practical exceptions' for the dogma EENS. So the Feeneyites there reject Feeneyite EENS in this way. They are comfortable.The CDF does not object.

The CDF also did not object when Ruth Graham and Ross Douthat in their recent reports interpreted Vatican Council II with the Irrational Premise just like Brother Peter Dimond.

The sedevacantists Peter and Michael Dimond reject Feeneyite EENS which they otherwise affirm,by interpreting Vatican Council II with the same irrational premise as popes Benedict and Francis.So this is the situation in the Church. The faith is being denied for political reasons.

The CDF does not correct Jimmy Akin, Trent Horn and Michael Lofton when they interpret rationally, and know they are doing it.

The CDF does not correct Bishop George Batzing, when he chooses to interpret Vatican Council II with the Fake Premise and then justifies their Synodal Way. He follows the error of Pope Paul VI, who could have interpreted the Council rationally.

The CDF does not correct Sister Nathalie Bequart when she says that the Synods are based on the ecclesiology of Vatican Council II. She means, of course, Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally.-Lionel Andrades

________________________

NOVEMBER 23, 2022

Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and Fr. Leonard Feeney were excommunicated for their orthodoxy

 From Twitter 

Fr.Leonard Feeney was excommunicated for affirming the traditional interpretation of the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation, extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).He did not say that invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance were visible examples of salvation outside the Church and exceptions for EENS.

The excommunication of Fr.Leonard Feeney was political. Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre too was excommunicated for not accepting Vatican Council II with invisible cases of LG 14 and 16 being allegedly visible examples of salvation outside the Church and a break with EENS.

Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and Fr. Leonard Feeney were excommunicated because they did not accept the irrational and heretical interpretation of Lumen Gentium 14( baptism of desire) and Lumen Gentium 16( saved in invincible ignorance) y the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF), Vatican and the Left. They both had to accept invisible people as being being visible. Then they had to infer that these were known cases.

So the CDF has issued a Decree of Prohibitions against Brother Andre Marie micm and the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary at the St.Benedict Center, in Richmond, New Hampshire, USA, for not accepting invisible cases of being saved in invincible ignorance as being visible exceptions for Feeneyite EENS.

Also the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) were not granted canonical recognition by Pope Benedict XVI, who said it was a doctrinal issue, since the SSPX had to accept Vatican Council II as a break with EENS and not a continuity with EENS. They had to confuse what is invisible as being visible, as did the popes. 

The  Congregatio Mariae Reginae Immaculatae (CMRI) of Bishop Mark Pivarunas and the Most Holy Family Monastery of Peter and Michael Dimond in the USA, are not being invited into the Church by Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican. Since they all have to interpret LG 14 and 16 irrationally to create a break with Feeneyite EENS, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX etc, as do the CDF and the present two popes.

If the Franciscans of the Immaculate would interpret Vatican Council II with invisible cases of LG 14 and 16 as being physically visible exceptions for 12th century EENS they would hold the same Cushingite doctrinal position of the CDF and  the political popes.

The CMRI and MHFM cannot be invited into the Church since they are not liberals who confuse physically invisible cases as being physically visible as did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger and Pope John Paul II and now Pope Francis.

So today Life Site News and the German bishops interpret Vatican Council II with invisible cases of LG 14 and 16 being visible exceptions for the 12th century strict interpretation of EENS. They are liberals and so will not receive the political excommunication of the popes.

If they affirm LG 14 and 16 as being physically invisible cases and say that they accept Vatican Council II in harmony with the strict interpretation of EENS they could be politically excommunicated. The present two popes have accepted Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally.

There is no apology from the Jesuits for expelling Fr. Leonard Feeney from their community. The Jesuits today accept LG 14 and 16 as being physically visible examples of salvation outside the Church and so Lumen Gentium 14 and 16 are objective exceptions for EENS, as , EENS was interpreted by St. Ignatius of Loyola.

The Jesuits today also accept Vatican Council II being a break with Ignatian EENS since invisible cases of LG 14 and 16 are physically visible for them. If they were invisible then they could not be objective examples of salvation outside the Church and practical exceptions for EENS.

So we have a convoluted theology in the Church with what is physically invisible being mistaken as being visible examples of salvation outside the Church in the present times. This is the basis for the liberalism in faith and morals and is called 'the spirit of Vatican Council II'.

If the Franciscans of the Immaculate say physically invisible cases are invisible only they could be excommunicated for saying the obvious. There is a prohibition on saying what is invisible is only invisible. The popes follow this rule. Invisibile people are visibile?

Upholding the invisible people are visible confusion is the green pass for a Catholic to not be excommunicated. The St.Benedict Center in New Hampshire would not say this. So a Decree of Prohibitions has been issued against them. They interpret the baptism of desire (BOD) and invincible ignorance (II) like the saints Thomas Aquinas and Augustine- and not like the CDF.

Now with 'the reverse excommunication policy' the traditionalists and those who oppose the innovation in the Synods could be placed outside the Church. Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and Fr. Leonard Feeney were excommunicated for their orthodoxy.

There was a political and false excommunication of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and Fr.Leonard Feeney of Boston. The baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance always refers to physically invisible cases. So how could they be practical exceptions for Feeneyite EENS? -Lionel Andrades

______________________

 NOVEMBER 19, 2022

Michael Lofton on Church Militant TV supports heresy and schism. It is with the False Premise that he gets his politically-correct liberalism 

CAN THE CHURCH TEACH HERESY?

ANALYZING THE MAGISTERIUM.

In this week's Mic'd Up, David Gordon interviews Michael Lofton, host of Reason and Theology. Michael's also a candidate for a theology doctorate, and the topic of his forthcoming dissertation is the Magisterium of the Catholic Church.

https://www.churchmilitant.com/video/episode/micd-can-the-church-teach-heresy

It supports the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS in Ad Gentes 7.There are no exceptions mentioned in the Council-text for Ad Gentes 7. There are also no practical exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II for the Athanasius Creed and  the Syllabus of Errors. The Council supports Tradition.It is Feeneyite.

So Vatican Council II should now be of concern for the liberals and the Left. They can no more cite the Council to support their progressivism.

Vatican Council II can be interpreted with a Rational Premise and Inference and the Conclusion is dogmatic.The Council supports the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus with no known exceptions.

But Michael Lofton, like Jimmy Akin, Trent Horn and Patrick Coffin, interpret Vatican Council II with the Irrational Premise and Inference and create a Non Traditional Conclusion which is and heretical.They were not corrected by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican.

The CDF too interprets the Council with the same irrational premise to intentionally produce a break with Tradition.The result is politically-correct heresy and schism. This cannot be Magisterial.

HERMENEUTIC OF CONTINUITY WITH TRADITION

The Council for me is a continuation with the past Magisterium of the Church on extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors. There is a continuity for me. This is my interpretation of Vatican Council II, in harmony with the past Magisterium. So for me Vatican Council II is traditional, with the old ecclesiocentric ecclesiology.It is not heretical. It is Magisterial and inspired by the Holy Spirit.It is the Magisterium according to the principles, the theology and doctrines, of the pre-1949 Magisterium.The present two popes are not inspired by the Holy Spirit when they interpret the Council irrationally and un-ethically. The use of the Rational Premise must be obligatory for all Catholics, including the popes, cardinals and bishops.

CMTV SUPPORTS HERESY

I reject the interpretation of Vatican Council II by Michael Lofton, interviewed for Church Militant TV's program Micd'up. He repeats the official heresy and schism created with an Irrational Premise. This cannot be Magisterial for me. How can the Holy Spirit contradict the past Magisterium and that too with an irrational premise and inference? This is human error. This is political. It is supported by the political Left.

POPE PAUL VI COULD HAVE CHOSEN THE RATIONAL PREMISE

Pope Paul VI had a choice. He could have interpreted Vatican Council II rationally.Even Pope Pius XII could have interpreted the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance rationally.He could have corrected the mistake in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.He did not do it.

FR.LEONARD FEENEY SAID THERE ARE NO VISIBLE CASES OF THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE.

Fr. Leonard Feeney was saying that there are no visible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance. This is common sense. This was known to the saints.They did not project invisible cases of the BOD and I.I as being visible exceptions for traditional EENS.But the popes from Pius XII made this mistake.

The error can be corrected but CMTV, like the two popes and the liberals consider what is unethical and irrational as being magisterial.They are liberals and so over look this mistake in the apologists at Catholic Answers and EWTN.-Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/11/can-church-teach-heresy-analyzing.html

____________________________________

NOVEMBER 22, 2022

Bishop Michael Olsen, Dr. Taylor Marshall, Michael G.King and the faculty at the Fisher More College were interpreting Vatican Council II with the Irrational Premise, when the Latin Mass was banned

 Bishop Michael Olsen, the bishop of Fort Bend Wayne,Texas and Dr. Taylor Marshall the Chancellor of the Fisher More College, TX,were interpreting Vatican Council II with the Irrational and not Rational Premise, at the time the bishop banned the Latin Mass.Even the President Michael G. King and the faculty were interpreting the Council with the Irrational Premise. The faculty rejected Vatican Council II interpreted with the False Premise while the bishop and Taylor Marshall accepted the Council with the non-traditional conclusion.

None of them knew that they could interpret Vatican Council II rationally and there would be no rupture with Catholic Tradition.The students did not know this too. Since the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican and other dicasteries in the Vatican also interpret the Council unethically.

Today Taylor Marshall and Bishop Olsen, like the CDF and the present two popes, choose to interpret Vatican Council II falsely, to be politically correct with the Left.

The issue at Fisher More College was not really the Latin Mass. The Latin Mass and the Novus Ordo Mass can be offered by a priest who will interpret Vatican Council II, EENS, the Creeds, Catechisms and the Baptism of Desire rationally.

The result is a return to the ecclesiology of the Roman Missal (1870).The priest in his homilies would have to be traditional and not liberal. Since liberalism has no support in a Vatican Council II which is in harmony with the Athanasius Creed and the past ecclesiocentrism of the Church.

Bishop Olsen today permits the Latin Mass ( not TLM) in his diocese but everyone has to interpret Vatican Council II as a break with Tradition.This is not the Traditional Latin Mass. In other words there are physically visible cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church in invincible ignorance(LG16) etc.It is only in this way that there can be practical exceptions for EENS.So EENS with no known exceptions, according to the missionaries in the 16th century,is rejected.It was the missionaries in the Middle Ages who were really, offering the Traditional Latin or Greek Mass. Since there was no break with the past theology of an ecclesiocentric Church.

But the Latin Mass in the diocese of Bishop Olsen today is a break with the ecclesiology of the Patristic period. -Lionel Andrades

 NOVEMBER 21, 2022

Young Germans must produce a video showing how Bishop George Batzing is dishonest

 

Young Germans must produce a video showing how Bishop George Batzing is dishonest. He is unethical when he chooses to use an Irrational Premise.With the Irrational Premise he confuses what it invisible as being visible. In this way he creates so-called practical exceptions.There are practical exceptions for the past ecclesiocentrism of the Church. He produces alleged objective exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( with no known exceptions) and the Syllabus of Errors( with no known exceptions).So there is a break with Tradition.

How can Bishop Batzing continue to interpret Vatican Council II with an Irrational Premise to create a rupture with Catholic Tradition? This is unethical even by secular standards. How can he be trusted on other issues, finances etc.?-Lionel Andrades

NOVEMBER 21, 2022

How can Bishop Georg Batzing continue to interpret Vatican Council II with an Irrational Premise to create a break with Catholic Tradition. This is unethical even by secular standards. How can he be trusted on other issues, finances etc.

MAY 31, 2022

Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Dr. Taylor Marshall contradict Pope Francis, the cardinals and the Left on doctrine.