Vatican Council II is being interpreted irrationally by all at the Synod in October 2023. This is a scandal. They will interpret Vatican Council II, the Creeds, Catechisms and Councils irrationally and not rationally. There is no denial from any of them

 

Vatican Council II is being interpreted irrationally by all at the Synod in October 2023. This is a scandal. They are interpreting LG 8,14,15 and 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as being exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). In other words there are visible and objective cases for them. For me LG 8, 14, 15 an 16 etc refer to invisible people in 2023. So there is no rupture with the dogma EENS and the rest of Tradition. Vatican Council II has continuity with Tradition for me but not for them.

All the religious and laity, who will vote at the Synod approved by Pope Francis and the USCCB, will interpret Vatican Council II, the Creeds, Catechisms and Councils irrationally and not rationally. There is no denial from any of them. Since if they do deny it and say they interpret Church doctrine rationally, it means they accept Feeneyite EES. This is politically incorrect for the Left.

The irrational interpretation of the Council is unethical and not Catholic. It is dishonest. The conclusion of the Synod cannot be Catholic when all the voters are faking it on Magisterial Documents.

Magisterial Documents must only be interpreted rationally.

This is morally obligatory.

Cardinal Blaise Cupich, Cardinal Sean O Malley and Fr. James Martin sj, must not confuse what is invisible as being visible and then project this error as being practical exceptions for the Athanasius Creed.

When Vatican Council II is Feeneyite, traditional and ecclesiocentric, how can there be a new ecumenism, new ecclesiology, new canon law, new evangelization etc? How can there be married priests or women’s ordinations? Since the Council is no more irrational and a break with Tradition.

There could be a schism in future on this issue of the salvation dogma with reference to Vatican Council II interpreted rationally, and no more irrationally.It is related to many other issues like dialogue, ecumenis, matrimony, sin, lex orandi etc. The issue is no more just EENS but also Vatican Council II.It now is in harmony with Tradition.

-Lionel Andrades

____________________________________________________

JULY 24, 2023

SynodWatch Session 3: Participation, Governance, and Authority : All the theologicans who will vote at the October 2023 Synod interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally to produce a fake break with Tradition

All the theologians who will vote at the October 2023 Synod interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally to produce a fake break with Tradition.

-Lionel Andrades

_________________________________________________________________

JULY 24, 2023

LifeSite News is not organizing a conference before the Synod in October to affirm Vatican Council II rational and ask the cardinals, bishops, priests and religious sisters to do the same. Instead LifeSite is holding a conference in Rome in October at the end of the Synod. This will propagate the Synod innovation, on faith and morals, based upon Vatican Council II irrational.It will avoid the real issue- Vatican Council II rational or irrational.

 

LifeSite News is not organizing a conference before the Synod in October to affirm Vatican Council II rational and ask the cardinals, bishops, priests and religious sisters to do the same. Instead LifeSite is holding a conference in Rome in October at the end of the Synod. This will propagate the Synod innovation, on faith and morals, based upon Vatican Council II irrational.It will avoid the real issue- Vatican Council II rational or irrational.

So even if Life Site News issues a petition after the Synod what difference does it make? None. Since Life Site News does not want to affirm Vatican Council II rational and neither do the cardinals, bishops, priests and religious sisters at the Synod.

For the organizers of the Synod there is ‘ a spirit of Vatican Council II’, ‘ a new revelation’, ‘ a revolution’, which comes when Vatican Council II, or any Church Document, is interpreted by confusing what is physically invisible  ( LG 16 etc) as being physically visible exceptions for the ecclesiology of the old Roman Missal, the dogma EENS, and all the Catechisms, Creeds and Church Councils. This is also how Fr. Altman and the Coalition for Cancelled priests interpret Vatican Council II, wrongly.

So what is the point in LifeSite News criticism of the Synod when John Henry Weston himself will not affirm the Faith in public on the salvation dogma etc? LifeSite News is in the same boat as cardinals Hollerich and Grech. Of course, JHW will not affirm the break in moral teachings as these two cardinals but he will interpret Vatican Council II irrationally, like these two cardinals, who use the Council to justify their liberalism.

Cardinals Grech and Hollerich could say that they follow the political Left, with heresy and schism, to avoid being ruined financially. It is the same for Steve Jalsevic and John Henry Weston at LifeSite News. All their correspondents are following the same politically correct policy of the Synod organizers. Even Mother Miriam interprets the Council irrationally and politically.

-Lionel Andrades