There are four important points to note before the Synod in October and the ordination of 21 new cardinals in September : we have a discovery

 There are four important points to note  before the Synod in October and the ordination of 21 new cardinals in September.

1. If LG 8,14,15,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II are seen as hypothetical cases always then they are not practical exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), the Athanasius Creed, the Catechisms of Trent and Pius X and the rest of Tradition. Invisible cases of LG 8,14,15,16 etc cannot be visible exceptions for  EENS. 

2. If LG 8,14, 15,16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to hypothetical and invisible cases then the Nicene Creed does not change when it states , ‘I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins’. It is a reference to the baptism of water.

But if LG 8,14, 15,16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to physically visible and objective examples of salvation outside the Church in 1965-2023, then Vatican Council II (irrational) is a rupture with the Nicene Creed. There are objective cases of LG 8,14,15,16 etc., which are a rupture with the Nicene Creed. Since the Creed will now mean, “ I believe in three or more baptisms ( desire, blood, invincible ignorance etc) which are physically visible and exclude the baptism of desire and so contradict Feeneyite EENS', or, EENS according to the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) and the Council of Florence (1442)’.

INTERPRETATION OF CATECHISMS CHANGE

In the same way the interpretation of Vatican Council II, irrational, changes the understanding of the Apostles Creed, the Athanasius Creed, the dogma EENS, the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24 Q, 27Q and 29 Q) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church ( 845,846,1257, 847,848 etc). The Catechisms can be interpreted with Feeneyism (invisible people are invisible) or Cushingism (invisible people are visible).

WE CAN CHOOSE THE HERMENEUTIC OF CONTINUITY WITH TRADITION

3. We now know how to create the hermeneutic of continuity or rupture with Tradition. We choose from either of them.

THERE CAN BE TWO INTERPRETATIONS OF MAGISTERIAL DOCUMENTS

4. There can be two interpretations of Magisterial Documents. They can be interpreted rationally or irrationally. The popes,cardinals and bishops choose the irrational version. So there is the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition. I choose the rational option. So there is the hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition.

So for me Vatican Council II does not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). 

This is EENS as held by Brother Andre Marie micm, Superior of the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire  and Brother Peter Dimond, apologist at the Most Holy Family Monastery, New York. The pope, cardinals and bishops cannot say the same. Also for Brother Peter Dimond the Council is a break with Tradition ( EENS etc). 

THIS IS A DISCOVERY. 

So this is a discovery before the Synod in October where all the participants will interpret Vatican Council II and the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms irrationally and so dishonestly. It will be the same at the ordination of the 21 new cardinals in September.There will 18 of these 21 cardinals who will be allowed to elect a pope. These 18 cardinals :-

1. Interpret LG 8,14,15,16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc irrationally and not rationally.

2. They also re-interpret the Creeds, Councils, dogma EENS, the baptism of desire and beings saved in invincible ignorance and the Catechisms, irrationally and not rationally.They re-interpret Magisterial Documents irrationally.

3. They choose the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition.

This is first class heresy according to the heirarchy of truths of Pope John Paul II ( Ad Tuendem Fidem).They do not have a right to offer Holy Mass. This is a scandal. 

According to Canon Law they are juridical persons and so have to affirm the Catholic faith in public to remain in office.

   -Lionel Andrades