The founder of the community Most Holy Family
Monastery, in Fillmore, New York was correct about Vatican Council II.
The founder of Most
Holy Family Monastery was Joseph Natale (1933-1995), who needed crutches to walk ever after contracting tuberculosis of the bone at the age of four.[2][3] Natale entered the Saint Vincent Archabbey in Latrobe, Pennsylvania, in 1960 as a lay postulant, but left less than a year later to lay the
groundwork for his own religious community…
Even before Vatican II was finished, I knew, and knew absolutely, that it was part of
a Communist conspiracy to destroy the Church. The bishops at the council wanted
to democratize Catholicism, they wanted an egalitarian theology, and most of
them were secret communists and Masons. They knew exactly what they were doing. My community here was the first
one in the United States to see the council for what it really was, and we rejected it
completely.
— Joseph Natale (as quoted by Michael Cuneo), Smoke of Satan (1999), p. 88 -Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Most_Holy_Family_MonasteryMost Holy Family Monastery
Vatican Council II can only be Feeneyite .Since LG 8,
LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, and GS 22 etc can only be interpreted rationally.
They are only hypothetical cases always.
According to Wikipedia the MHFM are Feeneyite because
they reject the baptism of desire (BOD). But the BOD was never ever relevant to
Feeneyite EENS.It never was an exception since it always refers to invisible
and hypothetical cases. It is Wikipedia which is making the mistake. They are
following the error in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of
Boston relative to Fr. Leonard Feeney. This Letter confused invisible cases of
the baptism of desire as being visible exceptions for traditional EENS. Then it
concluded that not everyone needs to be a member of the Catholic Church for salvation,
as if we humans could know of some exception in real life.
When Wikipedia says that the MHFM are Feeneyite it should
also clarify that Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church
can also be Feeneyite when they are both interpreted rationally.
Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church always have a hermeneutic of continuity with Feeneyite EENS.
The
hermeneutic of rupture comes only when LG 8, LG 14,LG 15, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS
22 etc, are seen as physically visible examples of salvation outside the
Catholic Church .This is irrational and it is unethical for Wikipedia. This is
misinformation about the Catholic Church on Wikipedia.
Critics of the MHFM like Catholic Answers, SPLC, Bill
Donohue etc, need to correct their interpretation of Vatican Council II and the
Catechism of the Catholic Church.
Unfortunately the MHFM still interprets Vatican
Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church, irrationally, like the
Vatican, which is called by them ‘the Vatican Council II sect’.
- Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment